Re: Evaluation for SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS

Wilkins94@aol.com
Wed, 10 May 1995 21:19:58 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael D Shellenberger: "Re: Evaluation for SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS"
Previous message: Carlos Osorio: "Intern-Mexico-U.S.-Foreign Relations (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Maryann Bell: "Evaluation for SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS"
Next in thread: Michael D Shellenberger: "Re: Evaluation for SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS"

I have no doubt that Prosoft's study will be as or more objective than any
"study" produced by the Maryknolls on the School of the Americas.
Furthermore, how condescending to suggest that two retired Army members are
inherently incapable of conducting unbiased research solely because of their
former military status. I can assure you that active duty or retired, we do
not march to the beat of some imposed doctrinaire view of the world --
including the future of the School of the Americas. At least give the Army
and DoD some credit for hiring an outside set of eyes to consider the matter.
Believe me, its difficult to find anyone who does not already know the
"truth" about SAO -- either pro or con.

Maj Mark Wilkins
Wilkins94@aol.com

Next message: Michael D Shellenberger: "Re: Evaluation for SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS"
Previous message: Carlos Osorio: "Intern-Mexico-U.S.-Foreign Relations (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Maryann Bell: "Evaluation for SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS"
Next in thread: Michael D Shellenberger: "Re: Evaluation for SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS"