-DATE- 19600516 -YEAR- 1960 -DOCUMENT_TYPE- SPEECH -AUTHOR- F. CASTRO -HEADLINE- GIVES FIRST OF FRIDAY SERIES -PLACE- HAVANA -SOURCE- HAVANA FIEL NETWORK -REPORT_NBR- FBIS -REPORT_DATE- 19600516 -TEXT- CASTRO GIVES FIRST OF FRIDAY SERIES Havana, Fiel network, in Spanish to Cuba, May 14, 1960, 0321 GMT--E (Summary) I have read the "notice" and the statements issued by the U.S. Embassy. The ambassador signed the statement. The explanation given by the embassy is that this is routine and similar notices are in readiness elsewhere. In those countries where there is no U.S. property such notices do not exist. Not all embassies in the world have them. In England there is none. In France does the U.S. have such notices? No one doubts that these countries do not have such notices. Why should they exist in Cuba? There is no such problem in Britain but I am sure that if such an announcement were made the British would be indignant and demand to know why this was being done. I am sure that our government has as much support as the British Government. the rebel government has as much support as the De Gaulle government. We have as much support as Adeneuer in Germany but the U.S. Embassy in that country would not dream of such a thing there. Why in Cuba? Are there going to be problems in Cuba? If so why is the American Embassy interested? It says the notices were to be distributed when circumstances arose which would make the distribution necessary. The previous embassy did the same thing but is the situation the same now? The old embassy was a Batista lackey and helped Batista obtain arms from the United States. Are circumstances the same? Batista did not rpt not have control of a large part of the country. We are not at war. There are no problems to justify this. The situation is not the same. If this was a routine action why was it done just at this time? Why was it not done in July or March or when the expedition was preparing against us? Much as happened but the embassy did not at those times print such an announcement. If such an action were routine the embassy would have done it before. This is not a routine warning. What are the circumstances in which it is to be used? Why does the embassy concern itself about circumstances? The enemies of the revolution do not have any faith in themselves. Their philosophy is the philosophy of Yankee intervention. The Americans have many resources. Since they are against the Cuban revolution, since U.S. Senators listen to war criminals the counterrevolutionaries believe they have the chance to resume power and destroy the revolution. No counterrevolutionary believes he can overthrow the revolution without the direct or indirect assistance of the United States. That is the counterrevolutionary philosophy. This warning and the circumstances under which it has occurred, Guatemala's disruption of relations with Cuba and so forth, justifies the indignation of the people. Why are the Cuban people concerned? A series of threats and aggressions coupled with this announcement is what causes them to worry. If it were not for the face that colonial countries customarily attack by surprise perhaps the people would not be so indignant. We have thousands of citizens in the United States but the Cuban Government has not printed any warnings concerning the protection of property. Why does the U.S. Embassy have to prepare such warnings? Do they think the revolution is not stable? U.S. propaganda would have one believe that we Latins are an inferior race, that we are condemned to servility, that we are destined to produce raw materials and sell it cheaply, that we are to work for nothing so the bosses can get rich on our sweat. All propaganda revolves around that idea. And we are expected to feel that they can publish what they want and we have no reason to be angry. But there are some among us those who await them with open arms. they are waiting for the U.S. marines. The U.S. explanation was not reasonable. It should have said that it would never hurt Cuba, that it will never attempt to invade us, that it will never organize invaders of our country. We want U.S. guarantees that it will not do what it did in Guatemala, Haiti, Mexico, Santo Domingo, and other places. Such a statement would have satisfied our desire for peace. Remember when Sandino was fighting in Nicaragua and U.S. and world public opinion was against it? Nicaraguans, nevertheless, died fighting. The monopolies were stronger and the National Guard was fashioned in the image and likeness of its creators. Public opinion was not heeded. Aggression took place in cold blood. The perpetrators had the noble ideal of safeguarding property and life. But in this sovereign nation all buildings of Americans and Chinese, all buildings are under the protection, not of the embassy, but of the Cuban authorities! (Applause) The embassy's concept of sovereignty is colonialist. It is colonialist, interventionist, and imperialist. The revolutionary government will protect all: Americans, Spaniards, and Chinese. Who are those who will protect only U.S. property? The counterrevolutionaries! This is the first revolution that has destroyed nothing. The people attacked no property. On the contrary, they protected it. The only ones who destroy property are mercenary armies and gangsters. So, once again, we must say the embassy's explanation is unsatisfactory and absurd. Here are some more reasons for the concern of the people, for the instinctive concern of the people. I have a report from the revolutionary navy. It says: Report on foreign war units near the northern coast of Cuba. On May 6, 1960, at about 2200 hours, the coast guard reported from a patrol position five miles from the northern coast of Matanzas that it spotted between its ship and the coast a submarine which refused to identify itself. The ship pursued the submarine for some 30 miles "challenging with a 20-millimeter machinegun." the submarine then replied with the signal C4T(U?) following a north (West?) course at great velocity and submerged. On May 7 the chief of the Cardenas naval post reported that a yacht was sighted to the north and a plane with the identification of the U.S. Navy flying low, m making a few turns, and disappearing to the north. The same day at 1630 hours the chief of the Cardenas naval base reported sighting U.S. frigate number 42 and two planes with the following numbers 7451L(M)7 and 7778, both flying low. On May 7, also, a Cuban merchant ship reported that 20 miles south of (Cayo Sal?) one submarine and two scout planes were sighted with the numbers already mentioned. On May 8 a Cuban ship sighted an American destroyer northeast of the (Itabo Baradero) Peninsula. The destroyer was named (Sullivan?) number 537. This destroyer had been sighted on various occasions. On May 8 at 1530 it was reported from Oriente that aviators of the revolutionary air force in a helicopter sighted the U.S.N. submarine Baracuda some three miles north of Cayo (Medano?) on May 11. At 0100 the light cruiser Norfolk was sighted at 2320 latitude and 8058 longitude or 2.5 miles north of Cayo Blanco. Another U.S. warships was traveling the same route. The ship Norfolk was believed within the three jurisdictional miles of our island. The navy would like to clarify that it is not officially aware of a request on the part of a war unit from a neighboring country to navigate in our waters. The three-mile limit has been crossed on various occasions in blackout as in time of war contrary to international regulations governing navigation lights. there is no apparent justification for concentrations of warships near our coasts. This information has been furnished by the revolutionary navy. There are many other things, too., Here is a magazine called (PAPOOSE?) which is published for the naval base. It has information and songs about Cuba. (Castro reads the words of one of the songs) (Applause and laughter. Highlights from other items in the magazine range from the cost and taste of beer to the "hundreds of prostitutes behind every door in Guantanamo). This is some magazine! What ideas! What racial superiority! What a concept it has of our people! What ideas and what opinions! And yet there are some who defend this racism. They invent philosophies to defend it. They ignore such things as this. (A reporter asks Castro about DIARIO DE LA MARINA and says it appears that some people are not satisfied with the way matters have turned out. He asks Castro for his opinion.) There are some who will not be reconciled. There are some who would have the people mourn all the evil things of the past. The people do not feel that way. No one killed DIARIO DE LA MARINA. It killed itself. The people know what the paper has been. The people will not cry. Those who blubber over this are those who do not care about the real tragedies of our country. They are the ones who are trying to confuse our people, to divide them so that they will become easy prey for the counterrevolutionaries. Working against the people, confusion is sown by those who do not care about the real tragedies of our country, by those who are not capable of taking up arms to defend their country, by those not capable of donating a cent to buy a bullet, by those who do not want to renounce luxury or make sacrifices. Those who have enjoyed only the beauty and marvels of our country, all the good things in our country, are not the ones who defend it. The ones who defend our country are those who had never had anything, because they know that today they do have something. The DIARIO DE LA MARINA has committed abuses against the people, a happy people enjoying themselves. Yesterday we were looking at some of the work of the revolutionary government and we met a group on the beach, one of the most beautiful natural beaches in Havana, and we conversed with several of this happy group. On this occasion I was thinking of all the plots, maneuvers,and efforts made to thwart the revolution. Thinking of all this, I started to recall the past when only the privileged ones could have afforded to come to such a place. Why this injustice? What does it cost to bathe? Nevertheless, beaches were for the privileged few. Sometimes we protested. This is just one example of how things were; there are many others. The education of the people was neglected. Educational benefits favored the rich, these who bathed at the beaches and had several houses. And yet the DIARIO tried to make the revolutionary government appear guilty of depriving the people of their liberties. What sort of liberty used to exist? Did anybody protest? The people were exploited and miserably deceived. Sure there was freedom; freedom to lie, freedom to deceive, freedom to sell to the highest bidder. The people were deceived and divided and this was necessary so that privileges could remain. The people of May 1 have come a long way. They have learned much with a promptness characteristic of revolutionary times when the truth is told. What our country was in the past, was with the support and aid of all those who today are crying over the DIARIO DE LA MARINA. How did this happen? Is there nobody here who does not know what the DIARIO was? Is there anyone here who does not know about the provocations it has been hatching since the triumph of the revolution? We have shown much patience in the face of all sorts of provocations. There is mourning for the DIARIO DE LA MARINA as though it had been a victim of the revolutionary government. This is not so. It was the victim of its own policy, its own betrayal. It is impossible for any counterrevolutionary paper to exist in a revolutionary stage, not because the government would close it. It is logical that in a true revolution that any counterrevolutionary newspaper would provoke a situation such as that created by the DIARIO DE LA MARINA . We did not touch the DIARIO DE LA MARINA; we did not close the DIARIO DE LA MARINA. The paper was using every pretext to do what it did. It provoked the workers and created conflict within the paper. The counterrevolutionary attitude of the paper became more obvious every day but the revolutionary government did not interfere. The most influential elements on the paper converged upon the revolutionary workers in the shops. they promoted divisionism among the workers with a view to provoking a crisis to be used as a pretext by "that gentlemen" to take asylum. A conflict was deliberately provoked before authorities of the revolutionary government could in any way seek a solution, offer any advice, as with the paper EXCELSIOR when we spoke to the workers. The director lost no time. He went to any embassy, took asylum, and immediately, the ball started rolling against the Cuban revolution as planned. If we have been guilty of anything, it was excessive tolerance and patience with the paper. Those are the facts. We cannot be accused of lack of tolerance, of violence. Was that gentlemen (Jose Ignacio Rivero--Ed.) ever pursued, threatened, or victimized by us? Even after events like the Coubre, campaigns of calumny, bombings, threats, never has a single citizen thrown a stone at the DIARIO DE LA MARINA buildings. Why? Because he knows that us not the spirit of our revolution, that we do not promote acts of violence, that we have always advocated a spirit of respect.l This was the policy which made the revolution triumph. We have never had to worry, even in periods of tension, about any act of hostility on the part of the people against the U.S. Embassy. They are not oriented toward violence or hatred but toward respect and pardon. The revolution has been generous; the tribunals have been generous. (Applause) The people interpret the policy we are endeavoring to carry out. The people know that enemies of the revolution exploit acts of violence. In what other country in the world have a people behaved the way we have, with a high civic spirit of respect and discipline and peace? The people know where there enemies are, who they are, and what they are doing. When La Coubre exploded, the people knew it was the result of a criminal act and the knew who the accomplish were. (Castro at this point enters a lengthy eulogy of the Cuban people--Ed.) On Jan. 1 we believed we had the right to confiscate all newspapers which had received money from the tyranny. (Applause) The revolution had a right to do this when so many of our colleagues fell dying in the mountains in prisons. For seven years those newspapers received bloody money from the tyranny. We had a right to confiscate them, but we did not do so. We did not want to be considered incapable of pardoning or intolerant or enemies of freedoms. What did we do? And what did they do? We had a right to punish those papers which received bloody money from the tyranny. We were generous enough to leave them alone. They were guilty of a great betrayal of the people and the country. They accused the revolution of being aggressive, violent. (Castro then discussed martyrs of revolution who fought for their ideals beginning with Marti, and DIARIO DE LA MARINA comment over the years on social, economic, and political reforms. He renews his attack on DIARIO DE LA MARINA and reiterates his earlier statements to the effect that the revolutionary government has not paid the newspapers huge sums of money as the tyranny did. He lauds the true revolution and declares that freedom does not exist in Cuba--Ed.) There is a part of the world which is misinformed about us. This misinformed part will say many things about us but we do not care what is said by that part of the world misinformed by U.S. news agencies. Let them say what they like. To conspire and fight against the revolution is not a right and we do not guarantee such an assumed right. The wealth and privileged are crying over their losses, not over the people from whom they have never shed a tear. Now the presses of DIARIO will print books for the people instead of lies. And the books will be cheap. (Applause) There will be opportunity for more people. We shall accomplish something useful. With the presses, we shall make great social gains. (Castro at this point recalls the efforts to destroy popular revolutions and cites the example of France in 1789 among others--Ed.) The people know that we are enemies of the use or abuse of force. The revolution has advanced with generosity, despite efforts by its enemies to make it alter this course. The counterrevolutionaries think they have more numerous ranks of foreign soldiers. They think they have a foreign force which they can use to achieve their aims. Public opinion is not important to them. We want to march forward; we have the will to do so, to do what others have not done before us. A new era has arrived. Cuba can now carry its head high and will not lower it under any circumstances. The nation knows this and this is the raison d'etre of the revolution and this is what is important. Announcer: Dr. Castro, I would like to inform you that there is a delegation here in the studio from the workers of the old DIARIO DE LA MARINA. (Applause. Colleagues from DIARIO DE LA MARINA come forward, wearing uniforms of the national revolutionary militias. They greet Fidel Castro, cries of support and "fatherland or death" are heard. (Applause--Ed.) The revolutionary government will see that those workers continue on their jobs. (Castro here is asked if he would care to comment on the recent downing of U.S. plane--Ed.) This seems to have been a bad month for U.S. planes because a plane was downed over Russia. According to U.S. authorities, it was spying over Soviet territory Now in Cuba, also, a U.S. plane was downed. It was going to pick up a group of of counterrevolutionary elements. It was fired upon and the pilot died. The plane was American; the pilot was American; the registration was American. U.S. authorities have stated they do not endorse such flights. So it happens that such a plane leaves U.S. territory and returns at night or at dawn and there are no problems. Something else occurred over Russia. A very late jet model crossed the border (reception deteriorates here and portions become unintelligible.) The pilot is captured, papers and all. And here is a plane that comes and goes, passes U.S. bases, flies many kilometers over U.S. territory, and it is not discovered. Either they do not want to capture it or they are deceiving the American people. They have rockets, they detect a plane, they claim they are perfectly prepared and yet a plane comes and goes over U.S. territory and is not discovered. They are the ones to offer explanations, not I. (Applause) The last time a plane was downed here, the United States sent a note requesting pardon for the incident. Do you think perhaps another note will be forthcoming? (Castro, not speaking into the microphone but heard in the background says something to the effect that (pardon cannot?) be requested every day. (Laughter) When we are lucky, we capture these planes. (In reply to a question, Castro says many industrial projects are moving forward--Ed.) We shall continue to sell sugar and we shall carry out all the revolutionary government plans with more efficiency and organization. We shall have another opportunity to speak more about this. -END-