-DATE- 19721018 -YEAR- 1972 -DOCUMENT_TYPE- INTERVIEW -AUTHOR- F. CASTRO -HEADLINE- CASTRO VIEWS ON INTL RELATIONS EXPRESSED -PLACE- CUBA -SOURCE- MEXICO CITY SIEIMPRE -REPORT_NBR- FBIS -REPORT_DATE- 19721018 -TEXT- CASTRO VIEWS ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS EXPRESSED [Interview with Fidel Castro by Marta Solis; Mexico City, Siempre, Spanish, 18 October 1972, pp 28, 70] A 1-1/2 hour travel in a popular Japanese Hino "guagua" (truck) took us deep into Havana Province. Reaching Flor de Itabo (closer to Matanzas than to Havana), we saw in the middle of a huge cultivated field a beautiful modern structure, a school consisting of two buildings, four stories high each, standing out in the agricultural landscape. This was a school in the field which Fidel was to inaugurate that evening. The new plan of the Ministry of Education of building secondary schools in the fields, to combine education with labor, is an interesting attempt in accustoming people, from a very early age, to work which, in this case, is both a target and an educational element. This marked the first year of construction of this type of school, of which there are 44 throughout the country, with a capacity for 500 students each. Our dozen foreign journalists accredited to Cuba were given elegant red seats whose legs had sunk into the moist earth. We were seated facing a platform with a rostrum from which Fidel Castro was to speak after a while. Suddenly, the shouts of the young, "Fidel..., Fidel," "tuned us up." The commander of Cuba had arrived in his usual olive green uniform. Fidel looked at the horizon. All that stood between us and him was a small staircase. The rain was upon us. The Prime Minister nodded greetings. There was lightning and thunder, followed by abundant rain. Fidel Castro came to be soaked with us. In two quick steps he was with us. Cuban greetings were exchanged: "How are things? How are you?" To one of my questions he commented on our interview published in Siempre 2 months ago. Publishing it surprised me, he told me. I thought that this was a private conversation... Yet, I answered quietly, I begged to be forgiven in that same interview. "The point is that you journalists are so indiscreet. You publish everything." This is our job... someone in the group said. Then Fidel laughed and exchanged friendly greetings with other correspondents. "Imagine what the journalists are doing. In recent years I have become involved in a mass of misrepresentations and news. Only two days ago a France Presse cable from Santiago de Chile ascribed to me a statement to the effect that in Chile Allende would have to violate "bourgeois legality" (referring to the statements attributed to Alain Peyrefitte, secretary general of the Gaullist party, who had visited Cuba in an official mission heading a delegation of French parliamentarians and who had later visited Chile). "Yet, I did not use the words bourgeois legality. Furthermore, I should not be nor am I making statements on the Chilean problem, since this would be incorrect. I spoke with the Frenchmen on the efforts, on the struggle waged by the Chileans to progress and on the difficulties they have... Yet, a cable is filed saying that I said that bourgeois legality had to be broken..." Fidel scrutinized all of us. Despite the topic of the conversation, he was in good mood. This was clear. On my side was the AFP correspondent in Cuba Michael Turguy who was trying to convince him that Peyrefitte had not given this information out of ill will. Lalic, the Tanjug press agency correspondent, was trying to take a picture. The EFE correspondent was informing Fidel of a report on the statements made by Anderson concerning Cuba. Meanwhile, the rain was continuing to fall heavily. "Look," Fidel said, "the other day a news item showed up... These days there have been a number of news reports tending to provoke friction. Anderson published an information from the CIA claiming that at a meeting with communist leaders in Chile I had criticized Allende's government. This was a total fabrication, from top to bottom. Another day a `gusano' ("worm") was published in the United States saying that I had indeed voiced a criticism. And now they are ascribing to me a declaration of a rather delicate nature..." Anyway, I asked him whether he did not believe that there are efforts to promote a real friction between the Cuban government and the Chilean Popular Unity? "That is the problem," Fidel answered. "Look, a press conspiracy, an orchestrated campaign, is taking place against Chile. Why? What is the purpose of Anderson's declaration and of the CIA things? The ITT case was true. Anderson, a sensationalist journalist, published the ITT documents. Naturally, we know how the CIA operates. Shortly after the publication of the ITT materials he published CIA information according to which we were engaged in subversive activities from the Cuban Embassy in Chile. One good and one bad. That is how the CIA operates: a sensationalist journalist would do something. Then, suddenly, the CIA tells him: All right, now publish this for me, and that is how they publicize him.... Now, at the present time, in the midst of escalating against the Popular Unity government, how is it that presumed CIA information falls into Anderson's hands, describing a meeting we have held with the communist leaders of Chile, speaking ill of the government? This is being orchestrated with a major offensive on the part of international reaction, the CIA, and imperialism, against Chile. Chile has been in the direct line of fire of international reaction." Referring again to the statements attributed to him, he clarified that he had discussed with the French parliamentarians the difficulties which the Chilean parliamentary majority is creating for Chilean government by opposing changes and social measures. In reality, however, Fidel said, "I am very cautions when it comes to such statements. I do not make them with anyone, least of all with parliamentarians who come to visit us from France with the best intentions in the world. This was a friendly visit and that is why I was concerned. Furthermore, I believe that the Chileans must resolve their own problems. This is unquestionable. We can discuss with them any kind of a problem or view..." Fidel was holding Anderson's latest dispatch, claiming that Nixon would be disposed to have a reapproachment with Cuba after the elections. In this article, Major Anderson claims that Nixon's belief is that there could be an improvement... I told Fidel. He cut me short: "Look, I do not believe any of Nixon's thoughts. Nixon is a scroundrel. This is my opinion and I have always believed it. He is a demagogue and a hypocrite. His aggression and his actions are sufficient in my judgment of him. Above all, the aggression against Vietnam. Here every day we receive and publish news. Photographs of destroyed hospitals, of destroyed schools, of bombed cities, of millions of tons of bombs dropped every day, as though it were a game: hundreds of airplanes bombing... One of the most incredible crimes in the history of mankind is being committed by Nixon and all for purposes of demagogy, even though knowing that he has not alternative other than to withdraw. All this out of annoyance, out of stubbornness, knowing that he is defeated...." Do you believe that he will withdraw soon? I asked. "He has nothing else left," Fidel answered. "This can no longer go on. They are economically ruined, they have lost prestige internationally, and they are facing a people who are not yielding, however much it is bombed. Therefore, whether he wins or loses the elections, he must resolve the problem of Vietnam. The Vietnamese have proved that no military technology would make them yield." The AFP correspondent then spoke of the trade which the United States would like to develop with China and the USSR... "Trade questions are something else," specified Fidel. "Look, I believe that they are beginning to correct some of their major stupidities. The policy of commercial blockade of the USSR and China is a singular nonsense. Why are they beginning to correct it? Because they have lost major trade areas in the world. The result was that other industrialized countries occupied those markets for the blockade was developing into a self-blockade. The policy of blockades must disappear for it stops being blockade and turns into a self-blockade. It began with the USSR, then China, then Korea, then Cuba. Today, they are beginning to correct their self-blockading policy..." Is this not a boomerang policy? I asked him.... Fidel went on: "Take the problem of airplane hijacking. Who invented airplane hijacking? The United States. Where did it launch its use? In Cuba. You spoke of `boomerang,' and that is what reminded me of it. Then all kinds of phenomena began to take place which now give them insomnia... Who invented the violations of international law? Who invented illegality, this type of climate in the world? The United States. It was not England, it was not France, or even less, the socialist countries. Who invented the cold war and the string of military bases around the USSR and the socialist countries? The United States. How many millions did they spend for this? The problem of war waged by the United States has already become an economic impossibility. Anyway, it can no longer go on spending as it has been so far. Furthermore, the United States has ruined itself morally even further. It has precipitated its moral ruin with the war in Vietnam...." The United States is suffering from a terrible crisis of values... Don't you think so? I asked. "They have it," the Prime Minister answered. "What about delinquency, vice, and robbery? Talk to people returning from New York. They will tell you that in New York one can no longer go out on the streets after 8 p.m. because he will be assaulted, even in the main streets. Just imagine that in this country of living `standards,' the country of the consumer society, the people cannot walk safely... Why? Because in the final account they are suffering from the crisis of values of the capitalist world..." Major, I asked, what do you think will happen in Latin America after the withdrawal of the North Americans from Vietnam? "Well... here is what I think. Our position on this matter is quite clear. We are not interested in debates of our problems. The relations between the United States and Cuba should be considered in the margin of its policies in Latin America. I believe that this is a rather clear and specific position. Well, we are not going to forget the role the United States plays of a policeman in Latin America for the sake of our particular interests. I believe that the day that the United States becomes a realist and stops being the policeman of Latin America relations between us could improve. These are the conditions and I believe that this is quite a clear position which I have presented and repeated.... I spoke of this with the French. This is something clear.... "Our policy in terms of the United States is very clear, I repeat. Public or private, it is the same. We have stated that first of all it must unconditionally stop its economic blockade; it must leave the Guantanamo Base and cease all subversive activities. This is unconditional. This is not to say that we do not engage ourselves to doing nothing in return or that we will not discus Cuba alone when we undertake discussions. This, I believe, is quite clear. They have the opportunity, if they want it. Well... let them stop the blockade. Furthermore, it is useless to them.... Look what a beautiful little school we have been able to build despite them. What about those which we intend to build... Even despite our own errors we are progressing...." Is this a self criticism?... I dared to ask. "Well," said Fidel, smiling broadly, "it is better that we be criticized for self criticism and not for being demagogues or liars...." He withdrew as rapidly as he had arrived. He was drenched and he criticized the fact that I had not become wet for all the tall gentlemen around us had protected me from the water. Several minutes later he spoke on education in Cuba, inaugurated the school, and, in the company of Volodia Teitelboin, member of the Political Bureau, and of Samuel Riquelme, both members of the Communist Party of Chile, attended a performance given by secondary school children. Perhaps the presence of these two communist leaders of Chile and their comradely attitude toward Fidel could be used by Anderson for another of his articles.... Could they? -END-