-DATE- 19731116 -YEAR- 1973 -DOCUMENT_TYPE- SPEECH -AUTHOR- F. CASTRO -HEADLINE- CUBAN WORKERS CONGRESS -PLACE- HAVANA -SOURCE- HAVANA -REPORT_NBR- FBIS -REPORT_DATE- 19731115 -TEXT- FIDEL CASTRO ADDRESSES CUBAN WORKERS CONGRESS Havana in Spanish to the Americans 1240 GMT 16 Nov 73 C [Speech by Cuban Prime Minister Fidel Castro at the closing ceremony of the 13th Congress of the Central Organization of Cuban Workers on 15 November--recorded] [Text] Distinguished Guests, Comrades of the Party Directorate and the Government, Comrade Leaders of the Central Organization of Cuban Workers [CTC], Female Comrades and Comrade Delegates to This Congress: It will not be easy to summarize in a few words the importance, the magnificence, the meaning of this event. It has correctly been said that this 13th congress of our workers has been an intense one. This congress has essentially expressed the level of political and revolutionary consciousness of our workers. Profound, important and decisive matters for our revolutionary process have been discussed here and throughout the process that gave rise to the congress. The first thing that stands out is the democratic spirit which prevailed during the work of this labor congress--faithful to the objective of developing a powerful and profoundly democratic labor movement. The matters discussed in the theses very closely concern essential matters in the ideological and political process of our revolution. But the decisions made here, even though they express--as was pointed out by Comrade Lazaro Pena in his report--the thoughts on the country's political direction, the thoughts of our workers were not established by virtue of a party decision, but have been widely discussed among our workers. No viewpoint is imposed. It is discussed with the workers. Measures are not adopted by decree, no matter how just or how correct certain measures might be. The basic decisions affecting the life of our people have to be discussed with the people, and especially with the workers. [applause] Some of the points of the theses were complex matters which required the understanding of the workers. They required wide discussion. Some of them would affect certain workers. Some of them implied sacrifices, but any sacrifice necessary among a revolutionary people qualified to determine their own fate is not made in the interest of any exploiting class but is made in the interest of the people. One of the essential points contained in the theses was this point, this principle: From each according to his ability; to each according to his work. This is an essential matter in the construction of socialism and our revolutionary and socialist workers understood that. In discussing that principle we have been discussing an essential and key principle of revolutionary ideology. That every one contribute according to his ability, that each one receive according to his work is a principle, an inexorable law in the construction of socialism. When we learn to understand this principle thoroughly we are penetrating the depths of political thought, we are penetrating the depths of revolutionary thought and we learn to distinguished it from another principle of the communist society established by Karl Marx: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. This is precisely what distinguishes the socialist phase from the communist phase of the revolutionary process. It is very possible that all of us would be more pleased with the communist principle, or that we consider the communist principle more beautiful, or that we all consider the communist principle more human. However, communism cannot be established by decree in a human society. It is a goal that must be conquered by hard trials during the struggle. It can only be the result of a process. Several years ago in our country one could not even mention the world communism. today it is necessary to explain that communism can only be the final result of the revolutionary social process. Although we may be more pleased by the communist principle, and we want to attain communism, it is necessary to begin by applying the socialist principle. Naturally, since the revolutionary victory we have been adopting measures and applying principles which have a certain communist character. There are certain services which all the people deserve. There are certain services which are applied based on the principle of necessity. As an example, public health is a service that is offered to all the people, that is offered equally to all the workers, without regard to their work or their ability. It is a service offered to all citizens. Another example is education. Our country makes every effort to offer the best education to every child, without regard to the family, the interests or the working abilities of the parents. There are many services which the revolution offers to all the people. However in the distribution of income to each worker one cannot apply that principle. It is necessary to apply the socialist principle. When we said on 26 July during the commemoration of the 20 anniversary that we should be able to courageously correct the idealistic errors which we could have made, that meant that if at certain points we had tried to advance more quickly than was possible, it was necessary to make corrections. The consequence of trying to advance more quickly than one can is to expose oneself to the need to regress. [applause] Here it is fortunately not a matter of regression. [applause] It is a matter of making rectifications because we are socialists [applause] and because we want to be communists [applause--crowd chants Fidel, Fidel and rhythmically applauds for 30 seconds] and because we will never renounce the communist objective or our revolution and the development of our revolutionary consciousness, because we will continue, above all, to uphold altruism, selflessness and man's solidary spirit. [applause] To apply equalitarian principles to work--that is to say, to work itself because, logically, during all of these years there have been salaries geared to production, such as for cane-cutting, or salaries geared to the quality of the work--to apply the equalitarian principle during the performance of work without regard to production efforts is an equalitarian principle that we must be able to rectify. Marx said that the principle that each one contribute according to his work, according to his ability [Castro corrects himself] and receive according to his work was a principle that did not go beyond the narrow limits of bourgeois law. He said this based on the fact that not all men are equal, that not all men have the same degree of energy, that not all men have the same ability. But Marx did not forget that socialism is built starting with the capitalist society, and over the ruins of the capitalist society. That is why he also stated the concept that we cited last 26 July. He said: During the advanced stage of communist society, the day the enslaving subordination of individuals to the division of work has disappeared and with it the contrast between the intellectual and manual worker; the day work becomes not only a means of livelihood but a prime and vital necessity; when individuals have developed in all respects and productive forces grow, and the springs of collective wealth flow in torrents; only then will it be possible to go beyond the narrow limits of bourgeois law and [only then] will society be able to write on its banners: From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs. Many events demonstrate to us that we are not yet prepared to live in communism. Aside from the fact that in order to live in communism it is not only necessary to have a communist consciousness but to have abundant wealth spring from man's work, it is necessary to develop the productive forces. And perhaps some of us are glad to show our weaknesses and our defects before such a worthy and representative audience of the international workers movement. However, if we are to examine this experience, if we hope to be worthy of the recognition, it must be because, in the first place, we do not hide our errors and our failures but because we [applause], but because we have the courage to admit them and to struggle against them. When we met with the tobacco workers we cited some of these examples. One day there was trouble with the water meters. The office in charge of distributing water and collecting bills decided to provide water free of charge. Now, this is something very wonderful, very just. Water is an essential element and yet, what happens? Water waste is incredible. One of the cities that wastes more water--when it has it and it does not have it partly because it wastes it--[applause] is the city of Havana. It is quite true that our water distribution systems are very old and are in dire need of repair. This is something we hope to achieve as soon as we can. And this is included among the 500 projects we must accomplish in coming years. But it is also true that wherever there is no charge for water, many persons never remember to turn off the faucet; [applause] that wherever water is given free of charge the effort made by any persons to solve the problem of water spillage is minimal and there is no awareness of the need to save water; that the communist distribution of water leads us to waste water thus demonstrating that we are not prepared to distribute water in a communist manner. [applause] What are the results of this and certain studies such as that which took place in Alamar. In Alamar there are conscientious and hard-working laborers. But a test was made. It was decided to give a number of families a certain amount of water, because even a certain amount of water can be given free of charge. Each one was give 90 liters of water per day. After that point, each one had to pay for it, and at a high price. In other buildings there was no charge for the water but the water was measured. And the result was--and I was there to verify these results--that the houses that did not pay for water used four to five times as much water as those that paid for it. And those on which a meter was installed did not use one liter more than necessary. [applause] We have plans for installing a water meter factory. What we are interested in is not charging for the water, but saving it. Charging you for the water is not the objective. Water is expensive and necessary for majorized energy equipment. The construction of new towns requires water and many already existing towns need it as well. The plan is to install--as soon as possible--a water meter in every home with a water supply. [applause] We can adopt two systems: Either we start charging from the first liter or we give a certain amount to everyone and after that start charging, as we did in La Mar where we had to levy a high charge to pay for the waste. [applause] We have another example. This not [an example] of communist-type distribution. It was practically semicommunist. We had female and male bus far collectors.l After a time, with full trust in the people's conscience, we decided to save on the fare collectors. We must admit that most people pay for their transportation but there are some who do not pay. There are some who put whatever they feel like in the coin box. When we examine the situation, on balance it appears that the number of people who do not pay is increasing. Anyone can ask these questions. What is more just, to have 1,000 bus collectors in Havana or 1,000 persons working in a textile factory? Anyone will realize that 1,000 workers in a textile factory will produce more for the people. However, it seems that our community needs to hire 1,000 persons for the unproductive task of insuring that people pay their bus fare. This is another example which demonstrates--apart from logic and theoretical arguments which can be easily demonstrated--that we are not prepared for a communist type of distribution. We can continue and ask how much fuel are we wasting? How much in the way of raw materials are we wasting? How much electricity are we excessively consuming? It is clear that with (?light patrols) and simple appeals to people's consciences, we are not going to save on electricity. I raise this issue because the electricity problem is an unpleasant one which we will have to face. It is an unpopular problem, but we have to face it. [applause] We substantially reduced the rate of an electric company--I do not exactly recall which. The electrical octopus was using a rate which encouraged the use of electricity. The rate on the first kilowatts was higher and it dropped as you used more. With our revolutionary inexperience we were improvident. We reduced the company's rates by half and we were left with the same condition which encouraged more consumption. I say we were improvident because we should have thought of the day when the electric system would not be the property of an electrical octopus but the property of the people. Now the electrical octupus belongs to the people and the people have to pay for the consequences of any electrical waste. Increasingly larger investments must be made. This is a nation poor in energy because it does not have hydroelectric power. This is a long and narrow island which has no big rivers or coal. We still have not found any oil and our jungle has no timber. We have to bring fuel from 10,000 kilometers across the ocean and invest hundreds of millions of pesos in electric generators and equipment. Today, oil is worth three times more in world market than before the triumph of the revolution. We still have the old rates, reduced by half, and a system which encourages more consumption. I am not giving you all these details to mentally prepare you for when the government changes the electric rates. I am simply explaining--as we do with everything--because we believe that the government must change the electric rates. Not the basic rates paid by those who consume relatively little electricity. We must start by changing the rates at some point and beyond a certain amount of consumption. Are we doing this for the sake of charging? No. We know that cigars provide us with a greater income than all the electrical systems put together. [applause] We collect more from drinks, and beer. I know what some prices are not popular. [applause] The idea is to save electricity. And if we increase the number of electric appliances what is going to happen with the television set and iron on all day? I seriously and honestly tell you that this is one of the problems the government is going to try to solve next year with a study of electric rates. I repeat that we are not doing this with the idea of charging you but with the idea of saving electricity. When I talk about saving electricity, the main culprits in the waste of electricity are production centers, especially management. [applause] The production centers management is largely to blame for much of the waste of electricity and for the failure to save electric power. We realize that an important factor for the existence of any factory or industry is the saving of electricity. The same [is true] for service centers and schools. We hope that the workers will wage a battle--among many others--to make saving electricity possible in work centers. [applause] An important problem concerning the use of electric power, [applause] is to use electric power during hours of minimum consumption instead of during periods of high consumption to prevent blackouts. I am going to give you an example: The water pump equipment used for irrigation, which operates for 12, 14, and 16 hours, should be used during the day and their use should be avoided between 17 at night and 9 or 7 and 10 at night. Otherwise we have no idea how much it costs. Even industrialized countries with large energy resources have problems during peak consumption hours. It is necessary for all work and service centers to exercise care in scheduling during the hours of high electrical energy use, so that all those activities which can be carried out at a certain hour are done at that time, and all those which do not have to be accomplished in that period--when there is high electrical consumption--are avoided to prevent the use and waste of energy. The state recently made an extra expenditure to purchase the so-called peak power plants. Almost $20 million was spent in order to have these plants available during peak consumption hours--until the investment being made in connection with the electricity problem begin producing. Plants are being built in Havana and plants are being constructed in Mariel--the nation has important electrical investment programs. The amount of electricity generated is three times more than before the revolution, and the electricity system is being considerably expanded. But it is not enough to expand and expand, and consume and consume fuel. We must have a policy to save energy, to save fuel. And the nation's principal fuel expense is the production of electric energy. Of course, our sugar centrals consume it, our cement plants consume it, our industry, our merchant vessels, our fishing fleets, our transportation--in sum everything that moves in the country, moves by fuel. For this reason a rate for fuel saving in every industry is essential. The world has a growing fuel problem. Independent of this situation--and as a result of imperialists aggression in the Middle East--future prospects look uncertain, and the world is facing an increasingly serious fuel problem. A tone of petroleum costs almost 50 pesos on the world market. According to projections and estimates, before 1980 it will be about $80 or $90 a ton, and the world will face growing fuel problems. This is another example of why we should develop a savings policy in all aspects, and especially with regard to fuel. It is here that the workers movement can give us extraordinary help. Wherever fuel is being wasted be it a farm, or a factory, or any place--these are realities which our workers have to face. But a study of an endless number of facts clearly demonstrates that our society, our people do not have the culture necessary for communist life--aside from the fact that an economy sufficiently developed for communist life is lacking. Realistically, very realistically, we must implement the formulas which apply to this phase of our revolution, and implement in every aspect--not only in distribution, not only in wages, but also in administration-- all the formulas which are applicable to the socialist phase of the revolution. [applause] And if we have made mistakes of any type, we must know how to rectify them, [applause] because, naturally, the workers congress is but a first step. We have talked a lot; you have been very concerned with the principle of producing more, of better quality, and at lesser cost. That is what the workers have said, and that is the very thing that the administration, which the entire economic apparatus of the revolution must say. [applause] To produce more, to produce better, at a lesser cost, and to adopt all the necessary measures. In connection with this principle the worker movement has suggested a series of appropriate and adequate measures concerning the relationship between wages and norms, between wages and the fulfillment, surpassing, or failure to fulfill the norm, concerning the problems related to extra hours when there is a real need for extra hours, and the problem of a double shift when an individual has to stay to work the shift of another who has not appeared. But, have these measures, these suggestions been made for personal economic gain? No, and perhaps the most interesting, the most extraordinary thing about the behaviour of our workers--aside from their consciousness--is that during this congress, there has not been a trace of this kind of spirit. [applause] That kind of economizing is a vice nourished in the hearts of the workers by the bourgeois and by capitalists. That kind of economizing would be unworthy of a revolutionary working class which thinks about today, but has the even more sacred duty of thinking about tomorrow, which thinks about the present generation, but thinks more about future generations. [applause] It has not been this kind of economizing that has inspired the suggestions of the theses, but a genuine concern for savings, for production, for productivity, for the discipline of work. And there has been, at every moment, the view that an effort must be made to fulfill plans without overtime. Do these suggestions contradict voluntary labor? No, because workers have understood perfectly the educational, revolutionary and communist importance of voluntary labor. And in their resolutions they have perfectly cited all those cases in which it is fair, adequate and correct to apply formulas for voluntary labor. On the contrary, the concern has been that voluntary labor should not be wasted, turned into a useless expenditure of energy, of human energy and material resources; that voluntary labor should not be turned into a means of disguising administrative inefficiency [applause], but rather, that voluntary labor service educational ends and aims of social benefit which fully justify it, making its existence meaningful. And our working class, in bringing up, in clarifying, in holding high the banner and principles of voluntary labor, has given proof of its high conscience and has paid a tribute of recognition to an exemplary revolutionary, socialist and communist: Maj Ernesto Guevara. [prolonged applause] Voluntary labor will be continued and will be kept clear of lies, impurities and waste. For this reason we say that this absence of an economizing spirit has been, in our opinion, one of the fundamental aspects of this congress, in the application of a correct revolutionary principle. This altruistic, this solidary feeling, this profound concern for the collective welfare and for the interests of the working class and the people as a whole has been manifested in other aspects, in other points of the theses, because different points entailed specific economic sacrifices. We have the case of Resolution 270; it was not an easy question. It was not a delicate question. It was not easy and not delicate because there were already half a million workers benefitting from 270. And law 270, or Resolution 270, had to be overcome, had to be abrogated. What has been the attitude of workers regarding this resolution, an attitude of our workers who were closest to retirement? It has been a exemplary attitude, a selfless attitude, a truly altruistic attitude! It is true that this was perhaps one of the most difficult steps. But our workers understood that Resolution 270 had to be suppressed because our economy could no longer endure it. I personally have a great deal of responsibility for Resolution 270. [prolonged applause] I thank you for this solidarity and faith. Nevertheless, I will develop the idea I started. We launched the idea of rewarding and making a special distinction of those workers with extraordinary merits. [applause] We wanted to tie it not only to individual efforts, but also to collective effort at a moment of great increase in emulation. Logically, that principle already had a fault which later became evident: There were workers with great merit who were not favored by the measure because the collective merit was necessary. And this idea and this contradiction demonstrates the dialectic development of events, because an idea that is good in one sense--just in one sense-- which attempts to unite two merits, the individual and the collective, can by itself become an unjust idea when cases with great personal merit are excluded. Then they express their complaint about the fact that without it being their fault, they did not benefit from some measure which does not affect them because their work center does not have such a reward or such a banner. We ourselves were concerned over the fact that workers whose conduct had been flawless-- and they were known for this by everyone at the work center--when they became ill and were absent for less than 3 days they had their pay docked. This method, this system was due to the fact, or had in Law 1100 been due to the fact, that there were many workers-- let us not say many [with emphasis], we can never say many. Many could appear as if it were the majority of workers. No. There were workers who would get sick on Monday, and at that time there were also doctors who issued sickness certificates for their friends. It had been considered that in the final analysis what was important about social security was the guarantee against sickness. It was not to provide for the patient for a day or two, but for the cases in which the patients really were sick, for a week, a month or whatever time was necessary. The true essence of social security is a guarantee for the important cases. That is why that resolution had been adopted in Law 1100. However, who could think about those workers with flawless conduct, to whom one had to apply the presumption that they had not been sick when they were off for 1 day. They were very well known workers at the work centers. The same thing with the cases of those workers who had dedicated all their lives to the job and had a flawless record when retirement time arrives. It is unquestionable that that idea entailed its application with exceptions, not as a hard and fast rule. From that idea emerged a resolution. We are not going to blame the Labor Ministry for that. We were at fault. When that resolution was drafted we should have studied it thoroughly, analyzed it thoroughly and seen under what conditions it was going to be applied. We have the obligation to prevent that measure from becoming a massive measure, as was the case with Resolution 270, because of the conditions under which it was applied. It became a burden to the economy and forced us to the bitter need to suspend it. It should also teach us that any measure of this kind that is adopted should be thoroughly studied by all of us [applause] to be absolutely certain of its results. That is why this was one of the most difficult points of the theses. Nevertheless, more than 99 percent of the workers approved it. [applause] The attitude of the immense majority of the workers who were close to retirement was truly impressive. An absolute majority of them approved the abolition of Law 270. [applause] and the revolution, as we said in another meeting, can never forget and will never forget those workers because a decision had to be made and it was a disputed point. Where to begin? Should one accept those who had already taken shelter under the resolution or not? The party adopted the opinion that one should not accept those who had taken shelter under the resolution because the faith and confidence in the measures adopted by the revolution were at stake and it appeared absurd and inhuman to accept those workers who had already taken shelter. Afterward came the situation of those who out of civic duty and revolutionary spirit, and to remain at the work center, had not sought shelter, although they could have retired. Or perhaps they were getting near [the point of retirement]. It was an interminable chain and it was necessary to make a decision, and it was decided to respect only those who had taken shelter in the benefits of the resolution. It was necessary to make a clean cut at a specific point. The workers meetings and the party analyzed the matter of Law 1100 and the eventual modifications of 1100 which are included in the resolutions. We are in favor of studying Law 1100 and taking it into consideration in compensations to workers who, having reached retirement age, decide to remain on the job so that their compensation percentage will be increased. [applause] However, we must study Law 1100 thoroughly and calculate it correctly, with a computer at hand, considering how much every measure costs and viewing the economic aspect of the matter, not delaying this law, no waiting for the Greek calendars because this is a problem which should be solved as soon as possible. We should also submit the modified Law 1100 for discussion of the workers. [applause] There is another point which was difficult, the problem of the historic wage. The historic wage had other origins. It was not, let us say, the result of an improperly studied decision. The historic wage emerged first as a necessity to establish a certain discipline in wages, starting from the enormous diversity of existing wage rates, from the necessity of establishing a scale and the desire and purpose of not affecting the workers because many of those historic wages were the result of earlier great struggles of the workers. The revolution did not want to adopt measure that would affect the workers. The historic wage arose out of economic necessity, consolidation of productive units where the workers had different wages. That was the origin of the historic wage. However, afterwards the historic wage turned into a vice. New sources of the historic wage emerged and there were even illegitimate sources of the historic wage. How could that socialist principle be explained unless one took a stand regarding the historic wage. However, the historic wage was a complex matter because, although the number of workers who earn a historic wage today has decreased in total volume, there were cases of nine historic wages. It was a problem which affected hundreds of thousands of workers. It was decided not to propose radical formulas, not to try to solve the problem from one day to the next because many historic wages had a legal origin and were based on the confidence of the workers in the revolution. Consequently, at the time we faced the problem it had to be handled with great care, taking into consideration the interests legitimately acquired. We had to adopt a progressive policy to prevent the emergence of one single additional historic wage in the first place, and to progressively, and by different roads, advance toward the disappearance of the historic wage. Logically, with the new scales, by tying wages to production one can, proceeding by various means, progressively eliminate the historic wage, not drastically, not in a way in which the workers might feel that the legitimate interests the revolution had granted once to them have been harmed, but persisting in the unshakable will to struggle until the historic wage is eradicated, through various means, including the limitation of the historic wage and so that every possibility of new historic wage will disappear [applause] to enable every man to receive the remuneration for the type of work he performs. If someone at a given moment holds a very important position and subsequently has to perform a very menial job, then let him go from a very high salary to a very low salary. [applause] Nobody was born with a position in this. This is not a hereditary right [applause] and we must apply this general principle even if it hurts, even if painful individual situations emerge. We have social security here so there will not be one single destitute person in this country. [applause] Any formula is better than the formula of maintaining the salary that used to be earned, and it is better to apply this principle fairly so that everyone knows this is the rule, that this is the principle, that this is the law, that this is the will of the workers. Logically, salaries must be related to the type of work, the quality, and the amount of work a person performs. If he is in a position of responsibility, an important job, he must have a higher salary. If afterward, and because he does not have the aptitude for the job, or if because of errors or pitfalls he is unable to continue performing such work, he cannot keep the same salary either. [applause] This is an essential principle. Naturally, it will take time. Drastic solutions cannot be applied in this overnight. But we will have to work stubbornly in this direction. Here we cited two important examples of topics decisively supported by the workers, despite the fact that this implies for many of them sacrifices of a personal nature. But, at the rallies these topics were not the only ones discussed, many other points were discussed. They have been taken into account at the congress and have been borne in mind by the party. And we will bear in mind the resolutions that have been adopted on these points. This does not mean that this entire process has revolved around any given single thesis. Throughout the congress other matters of concern to the workers were raised. And because a given number of workers showed concern at the assemblies, their worries have been picked up by the workers movement and the party. That is how we have, for example, the matter of revising the wage scale and the qualification yardsticks; of not setting a limit to overtime in certain activities; the accrual of paid rest for manual farm workers; the stabilization of salaries in the sugar industry. There we have another problem, a different one, because 1 day salary stabilization was established in the sugar industry. A worker representing the free Cuba unions said here very clearly that during the capitalist era 200 workers used to do maintenance on the central sugar mill, but now that stabilization exists there are 702 and 708 workers. We did not question this then because we had many visitors and because we were embarrassed. It is true that we have not participated in this congress; we were invited to this congress. Some have asked why we did not speak at it. It is because we did not come here to speak. We came here to listen to you. [applause] But it came to mind that if we had asked many of the representatives of the sugar mill workers how many workers operated the sugar mills during capitalism and how many operate them now, it could be shown that we are using much more labor than the capitalists used and that we are operating the mills less efficiently then the capitalists. [applause] This does not in any way detract from the revolutionary spirit of our workers. Our workers are not to blame for this: we are, because we have been unable to develop administrative efficiency at least on a par with the capitalists. But we are to blame if a sugar mill becomes full of workers. It is said that without a doubt we have this stabilization. We were told that there was not sufficient manpower in the mills, that stabilization should be established, and stabilization was finally established. Now we will have to see what is to be done with stability in order to apply this principle. But I am not saying we must find a solution overnight. No solution we week can be reached overnight. All solutions must be studied carefully. [applause] Of course our sugar industry is a great disgrace. It is a disgrace for the country that its main industry should be a seasonal industry. Naturally this gives rise to very serious problems because this industry works only half the year, and the revolution also has sacred duties to the workers, such as finding a job for all workers, and employment which must be as stable as possible. We must think of ways to find stable jobs for the workers of the sugar mills. We even hope to turn every sugar mill into an agricultural-industrial center in which during the idle season not only is the sugar mill itself repaired, but also all machinery, the irrigation systems and all of the equipment. In sum, we have to look for some type of activity because it is obviously very unprofitable for a sugar mill that used to be maintained by 200 workers to now have 700 regular workers. At (?least) the worker said 400 were enough. He did not explain very well why he said 400, but he said 400, in all honesty. It is true that if today we had more construction material, the work we could give the sugar mill workers when the sugar mill is idle would be construction work. We surely need construction of all types everywhere. But unfortunately we do not have any surplus material in order to give surplus sugar mill workers construction work. Naturally, we believe that the decision adopted is correct; that is, to study the problem and to see how this principle is applied in relation to the sugar mills. anyway, we cannot maintain a clear conscience when we face the reality that thousands of sugar workers are being underutilized, workers who are on the sugar mills payrolls by virtue of the stabilization, not measures that imply abandonment of any worker. The revolution will not leave them unprotected. It will never leave one single worker abandoned to his fate in this country. [applause] Let us devise a formula. Let us devise formulas. Let us look for solutions that would be not only just, not only human, but also profitable. And let us not follow the line of the least effort, of the easiest solution, eve if it turns out to be extremely burdensome for the country. Some of these problems also result from underdevelopment. To the extent that we develop new industries at the sugar centrals; to the extent that agriculture is revolutionized; to the extent that agriculture is turned into industry and the industry around all of the sugar centrals we will have more job opportunities and we will have more solutions for this type of problem. However, we must be duly concerned about this matter. Also raised were the cases of loss of the ability to work because of sickness or accidents on the job not attributable to negligence on the part of the worker, and that these cases be taken into account for the purpose of remuneration. It was proposed that total deductions not be made in connection with the work the person was performing previously. This is a just concern, as are the restoration of wage scales and the matter of double occupation. the teachers' time fund is an old problem that is brought up at all assemblies, from production assemblies, to the culture congress to today's meeting. Medical teams, the elimination of checks for the journalist sector [retired journalists]--which I understand is now going to be discussed at the newsmen's congress because the newsmen are workers who also have their congress. And the elimination of food and lodging bonuses apparently has been a very popular proposal in this congress. And some of these measures which once were taken with very good intentions later became an ordeal. Many of these are matters which were not considered among the topics but were raised by the workers and discussed in congresses and which our party will study very carefully with the intention of solving everything it can solve, discussing these matters with the comrades of the labor movement. One cannot have rash solutions to the problems concerning some of these subjects, such as medical teams, for example, because it has to be determined how many doctors we have available, what the [medical] service situation is, and what the situation is in each of the hospitals. But we must analyze the solutions wherever possible. We must also consider in a positive way the problem of double employment and all those actions concerned with the problems of the economy, production and services. We think it would be unjust for a retired worker from the sugar mills to work in a technological [institute] during the day and not be paid. He should be paid. Logically, if he is receiving a certain salary [from the mill] and we then give him another job, it would be quite proper to pay him for the 3 or 4 hours he might work. The problem with the teachers is something more than one of funds based on time. Teachers have a very precarious salary scale, especially the public teachers. You know that a large number of the teachers have no certificate. But, they start with a very low salary. Certainly we must assess this problem with the teachers and try to find some solution. Their work has become quite intense. The successes in education in the past few years have been extraordinary and encouraging for the country in every respect. I am certain that all the workers absolutely agree that a study must be made to see how we may better help the teachers. [applause] While the preparations for this congress were going on, party leadership analyzed several of these matters on which you have passed resolutions. For example, the party leadership adopted general measures to restructure the salary scale, revise classifications, improve pay for abnormal work conditions, apply the method of payment according to output and increase state rates in units which advance into technical organization and establishing work norms. I know you have understood this last point perfectly well, but I am going to add some further information. To a certain extent we are tied down because some norms are very low. Some are more adjusted than others. Logically, a contradiction would arise if it is shown that the [production] norm is low and is overfulfilled. The result could be that the norm should be raised. Right now you propose in the resolution an idea--that of increasing norms. It remains to be seen what criteria you will use to apply the matters of the norm, the salary adjusted according to the norm and the norms to which it will be adjusted. You know that some norms are undoubtedly low and the labor leaders will have to honestly determine if the application of some of these principles cannot be translated into increased salary and increased production. In any case, we believe that the norms are set, in one way or another, and no matter how much you try to improve them they will continue that way. And when really technical norms are set, productivity will logically be increased. But we have been thinking that in those work centers where technical norms are implemented and, as a result of truly technical and scientific norms, productivity is increased, a salary scale should be applied different from the scales in work centers where elemental norms are applied. That is the principle. Have you understood it? [applause] In other words, when technical norms are set in an area, regardless of problems, a salary scale is introduced greater than in an area where technical norms do not exist. That is the reason for the increase in state rates in the units that go into technical organization and establishing work norms. We have expressed the party's desire to analyze together with the leaders of the labor movement every one of the matters that you have proposed in the resolutions, with the aim of solving them. Studying them carefully, of course, with the greatest possible urgency. There is already a policy within the party leadership on many of these matters. Are you sufficiently bored? [applause and shots of no] It would be interesting if we were to go from this congress and the entire process that preceded it into real maximum progress for the revolution, to point out some things that must concern us and provide some interesting data. There is one thing without which none of the resolutions we have adopted at this congress would have practical possibility. The questions of giving each according to his work, of paying for extra hours or for double shift, or of revising a salary scale would be of no use if we do not maintain a financial balance. The application of material encouragements has no value and no effect in a situation of rampant inflation. If we have been able to discuss the problems and the adequate formulas and solutions, it is because, as a matter of fact, money is beginning to have some value. In a situation where anyone could have his pockets full of money, none of these formulas would stand a chance. Something else must be said. Under capitalism money is everything. Money means life and death for the people. We pointed out our weaknesses and our discipline. But, the capitalist system functions under certain very powerful motivations. In the first place, capitalism has an army of reserves in the labor force--the unemployed. And there is no discipline more efficient than the fear of losing one's job, which in capitalism is the equivalent of dying of hunger. [applause] At the doors of every factory there is virtually a line of unemployed waiting for the opportunity to find a job. That mechanism facilitates capitalist discipline. Furthermore, a worker under capitalism who does not have a job or has no money dies from hunger and his family too dies from hunger. Should he, his children, or his family become sick, they die; likewise, if he has no job or money. The prospects for living, for taking care of his health, for obtaining security against old age and accidents, and the prospects of educating his children depend on his job and the money he has in his pockets. Under socialism this does not happen. Although socialism is still not communism and although distribution that is [words indistinct] is still not the same as in communism, unemployment, insecurity, fear of eviction, fear of illness, fear of accidents disappear under socialism. Everyone is assured of a job. of medical attention under optimum conditions--and much better than the capitalists have for themselves under capitalism. We can proudly say that our medical services are much more efficient than the capitalists have for themselves and their families. [applause] The revolution has eradicated and attended to diseases. The infant mortality rate in our country is already equal to that of developed countries; in other words, it is at a minimum. And our medical services are improving and will improve each year. We even recently established house calls from the polyclinics for the elderly and children. [applause] Socialism offers all this security to the people and their families. Under capitalism, man's first motivation is survival, his health, his children. He fears not having a cent in his picket when a relative or a dear friend of his is ill. The capitalist system's labor discipline feeds all these terrors. In other words, they are the inhuman conditions of life and death of capitalism, and that is what prevails in the capitalist discipline. Those defects do not exist in socialism. Those motivations do not exist in socialism. Under socialism, money is not indispensable for all these things. Of course, these things are important and of interest to the workers, but the most pressing problems have disappeared having been solved by the entire society. That is why the contribution of workers' awareness, the workers' political education and their attitude become irreplaceable elements in socialism, since the workers' motivations are different [than under capitalism.] Of course, under socialism we see a total identification of man with production media, the total indentification of man with the country's wealth, the total identification of man with his country's destiny, with the political process of his country, with the political problems of his country; that is to say, the worker becomes, goes on to be, the owner of the wealth and has a hand in forging his nation's destiny. But the moral factors, the factors of conscience, the cultural factors are irreplaceable under socialism. We should not think, even for a minute, that we are going to solve with money those problems that only the conscience can resolve. What we should do is use material incentives intelligently and combine them with moral stimuli, use them as reinforcers. We should not believe for an instant that now we can manage today's man, the socialist man, by virtue of material incentives exclusively, because material incentives do not have the attraction here that they have under capitalism where everything depends--life and death--upon the money in one's pocket. In any case, an abundance of money, a superabundance of money, becomes a factor that discourages work in many persons, not all. We cannot for an instant forget the tens of thousands of workers, the hundreds of thousands of workers, the immense majority of workers of this country who are willing to do--in every sense, at any instant and without a material incentive of any kind--whatever is necessary, to work harvesting sugar, defending the country, anything. This we can never forget, as some workers said, when there were no home appliances, when there were no microbrigades, when there was no housing, when there was nothing--what was done by our country's workers, by which they acquired the extraordinary conscience they have today, which we are proud of. We feel proud before our visitors with whom we should not be--even if we are--bashful. We do not hesitate also to recognize our weaknesses. Since 1970 there has been a process of deflation, a decrease of money in circulation; that is to say, we were millionaires in 70 and 71. Now we are less so. Of course, the economy has continued to grow. In 1971 it increased 5 percent; in 1972 it increased 9 percent; so far, in 1973 it has grown 13 percent; the accumulated total is 30 percent [as heard] in 3 years. Of course, one of the sections most responsible for the economic growth has been the construction industry. Of course, we must plan for the coming years a modest but steady growth, as we said in the commemoration of the 20th anniversary, about 6 percent a year. This is equivalent to doubling all production in 11 years. It is not a growth rate to be scorned. It is not sensational either, but we should not...if we can surpass these rates, we should, but planning very realistically. For this reason we say 6 percent a year for the next 20 years. Wages have increased these last few years, at at least what is paid in wages. In 1967, in salaries alone 2.773 billion were paid. For 1970 the amount was 3.111 billion, in 1971, 3.187 billion, for 1972 3.367 billion. This year the estimate is 3.690 billion in wages. Even though wage allocation is greater, there has been decimation. Later on I will explain why. First I want to add that social security amounts to 547 million because social security increases yearly by 11.100 million. Payments to peasants for agricultural produce: 240 million, and other payments to the people, private carriers stipends, students and so forth, 277 million, which amount to a total of revenue received by the population amounting to 4.750 billion pesos. That is the money received in 1973 by the people. The wage allocation has increased some 907 million since 1967. Despite this, the money in circulation has decreased because the people have been spending more than they have received. This process started in 1971. In the second half of that year 150 million were collected--oh, I forgot something you will surely want to know: how much money the people had at the highest point. They had 3.478 billion. That was the highest figure. Now we are poorer--in the second half of 1971 a total of 150 million was collected. In 1972 the amount was 680 million. In 1973 400 million. a total of 1.230 billion has been collected in a little less than 2 1/2 years. Naturally, this is money that has been collected from the people and eventually goes on to enrich them because, although it may seem paradoxical, the more money we had in circulation, the poorer we were. That is to day, this money was not collected by latifundists or by the bourgeois; it was the revolutionary state itself-you! [applause] As you know, this has been done in two ways: increasing the goods to be distributed among the population, and increasing the price of some nonessential articles. When I say nonessential; not milk, bread, food, rather cigars, drink, and so forth. But the people sold nothing. [as heard] And the effects of this progressive decrease in money are already beginning to be seen. Do you understand? [chorus "yes"] We are delighted that our workers have this data and understand this because it is the only way to go forward. We are not speculators. We do not like expensive things. That that sea of money was being felt by our economy. Tell me, in the middle of that sea of money, what good would all the agreements of this congress be? We already know that if there is more money than goods and services, interest is lost in money; that money which in no way resolves some vital problems--because those vital problems are already solved for you by society--everyone can feel at ease with his children, with everything, one does not need money for that. To educate a teacher costs a lot. To educate a nurse costs a lot. Think of the years after elementary school, then high school, then a qualified woman, and the need for teachers that we have. But if someone had a good salary--a young man--and he married the teacher, he tells her not to work, it is not necessary. And the country loses the teacher. And the country loses the nurse. Naturally, if the country loses a teacher or nurse, it does not lose her only in terms of money, but also in terms of traces of "machismo" and superman concepts of the past, and all those things we still have left. [applause] What do we do with this? Return to capitalism? [cries of "no."] Where women live off their husbands? Where a woman is an adornment at home? [cries of "no!"] I am sure that Cuban women at least will not agree with this. [prolonged applause] We must not forget that now we have two women in the CTC Executive Secretariat. But all this superabundance of money was being felt in economic terms. There was a need for a working force--in some places critical, sometimes an important service-- and no workers could be found. There was a lot of money, which is one more example of our lack of preparation for communism. Because Marx said: "When work is not just a way of life but the primary vital need..." and when the young man who marries sends the teacher home, we can see that work is still not as Marx said, "the primary vital need." Not just "a way of life," he says "vital." That was the situation. Textiles were at a standstill. Such a factory lacks manpower; those who were working have left; of the 100 workers 60 have not shown up for work; there was no stability among the workers. That is the logical result of the superabundance of money. Do you realize this? [crowd yells "yes!"] Now we are beginning to see things happening in the opposite direction. We notice a great demand for work. All of a sudden we are faced with the problem of trying to find a job for everyone who asks for one. Well, we will have to pick our brains and solve it. However, this is better than having the factories idle due to a lack of manpower. We do not want a manpower army in reserve. That is clear. Besides, the revolution will not resort to such measures because these are capitalist measures. [applause] Anyhow, we must live. We must meet our material needs. We must move forward, overcome underdevelopment, defeat poverty. Therefore, we must be realistic and understand all this to see what measures we are going to implement and why. We must know what is good and bad for our economy. We must know how many of us and to what extent we are revolutionaries and communists, and what we still need to make us true revolutionaries and communists. [applause] At present there are 2.248 billion pesos in circulation on the street. This has dropped some: a little less and we will have what is considered by experts to be within the normal limits of money in circulation. It is considered a great thing to reach normal limits, no doubt an improvement. Without these normal limits none of the economic agreements you have approved would have any practical function. I am talking of economic agreements. They could not operate. They would have no validity. There is a very important principle concerning financial balance: the amount of money in the hands of the people should not exceed normal limits; what is paid in wages and the total of available assets and services to the people must balance, (?if we do not want) to squander money. If we start paying wages that are greater than available goods and services we again become millionaires; that is, plenty of paper and few assets and services. Therefore, it is very important to maintain a balance between the population's total income and available assets and services. This is a basic principle. Do you understand this? [crowd yells "yes"] I have here a list of what the people spend. But let us say, cost of urban reform is low, it is 60 million, 46 million for movies and theatre, 70 for electricity and gas. These are not income items. We even have statistics of what is spent on haircuts, at the barber shop, transportation, those who pay their fare [laughter and applause] Next year we still are planning to collect some more money. This is good to place ourselves within the limits. That is, if the experts are not mistaken about the limits. Now let us see what the obligated funds are due to increase in wages for next year. Not to mention prices. Of course, some prices are high, but others have remained stable. They have not been touched in a long time. Do you want to hear some good news? Let me tell you that the comrades of the service sector have proposed a cut in the price of alcoholic beverages. They have a surplus. If we cannot export it, it is better for the people to have it. This is another principle. We must get used to seeing something in the warehouses, because if there is something there, the people are in the habit of asking why [laughs] why not reduce the price? We must get used to having something as proof that what is earned in wages has been balanced out in the treasury. [applause] The stock they have available is more than sufficient and they will have a small reduction. But then, how much will have to be set anyway next year for additional wages to the population. The increase in the work force is--113,500 workers--$177 million pesos. This happens every year and when there are more, more [will be spent]. Reduction of absenteeism--here is an optimistic estimate: This will represent 37 million more in wages because of the confidence in the agreements of the workers congress. [applause] Changes in work positions, .5 million; Social Security Law 1100, 40 million. In all the obligated expenditures total 254 million more pesos in 74 than in 73. Is that clear? Therefore, 254 million more will have to be disbursed-- even if we do nothing but employ those who have to be employed and retire and pay pensions to those who retire. These inevitable expenses. If necessary we will use different standards than those approved in principle by the party in keeping with the proposals of the workers and those approved by you: elimination of the first two groups, classification reorganization, vacation pay-- but here vacation pay is wrong. In reality it is a deduction, and if that is so, I fail to see why it has to be added to the expenses. Well then, the elimination of the first two groups, the scale which affects agricultural workers, 10.5 million; expansion of the technician wage scale to expand the technicians' wage scale so that there can be more adequate wages for more skilled personnel--this would amount to 67 million. This is theory, no? These decisions have not yet been made. They are being considered positively. Expansion of the wage scale of personnel responsible for the direction of production would amount to 65 million, revision of standards, 7.2 million; pay for abnormal conditions, 50 million; overtime and double shift pay, 55 million; linking of salaries with norms, 44 million; technical norms 2.5 million; others, 13.6 million. this totals 341.8 million, the application of all this would signify a total of 569 million more in wages in 1974. Here when we speak of expanding the scale of personnel responsible for the direction of production it involves the chiefs of brigades, who must have wages equal to the wage of a tractor operator. What does this mean? It means that we must be very careful in preparing all these agreements. What does it mean [word indistinct] we must begin studying the centers of production and applying these agreements here, where every wage increase will be accompanied by an increase in material production, so that material production will be expanded to the same extent that wages are increased. Of course there is production which is not translated immediately into [Castro corrects himself] which can be produced in wage increases, and not in increasing the assets available for the population. For instance, a thermoelectric plant being built in 2 years does not yield an immediate increase. There should be wage increases in construction, but there are constructions which do not immediately increase service to the population. But, in short, these measures can only be applied progressively, carefully, beginning with all those work centers where the work force is fundamental, where the wage increase is immediately converted into increased assets available to the population. We must carefully evaluate and discuss all of these measures and their economic consequences with the labor leaders to prevent the agreements, which may be formidable instruments to raise economic efficiency, from leading us to a new inflationary process in which wage or salary disbursements are not consistent with the production of material goods. And above all, we must be careful to have a financial balance. We would be doing nothing by implementing the agreements if we again encounter a financial imbalance. It is very important that labor leaders understand these details. In any case there is an increase in the production of material goods. But what we cannot do is increase salaries above material production, because the country must also make large investments for development and this is very important. Sometimes, our production of material goods does not limit the labor force. In all cases, the limitation factor on the labor force for the production of materials is work. There are many industries which have reached their capacity for work and can provide no more. In other industries the limiting factor is raw material, which is costly, scarce or not available. There are cases of inability to utilize an industry for lack of raw material and the industry must be used for other things because of the labor force problem. Where raw material is the limiting factor, it has to rely on the possibility of acquisition of the raw material abroad. Naturally, if sugar production increases and exports of sugar increase, we have one means of increasing imports of raw materials. Imports can be increased as exports are increased. However, it is not easy to resort to imports. Why? I am going to show how prices have been and are in the world market. To cite a few examples, it is said there is a lot more money. We are going to bring more import goods. This, in the first place, depends on our exports. Here are some examples: Beans: The price per ton in 1969; 121.5 pesos; the price of beans which must be purchased for 1974; 574 pesos per ton. Corn: The 1969 price in the capitalist market, 58.8 [Castro then corrects himself] 58.08 and the price for 1974, 131.55 per tone. Wheat: 71.76 in 1969 and 159.45 for 1974. Rice: In 1970 the price went as high as $90 per ton; the price for 1974 will be 400 pesos. Vegetable oil: 228.51 in 1969; the price for 1974 is 329.22. Powdered milk: 128 pesos in 1969; 603 pesos in 1974. Vegetable flour: 93.60 in 1969; 191 in 1974. Fishmeal 129.80 in 1969; 386.2 in 1974. Phosphoric, a raw material, 22 pesos in 1969 and 50 in 1974. Urea nitrogenized fertilizer, 80.3 in 1969; 141 in 1974. Superphgosphate, 67.67 in 1969; 120 in 1974. Rayon fabric, 643.3 in 1969; 964.69 in 1974. Wool fabric, 871.23 in 1969; 1,370 in 1974. Cotton thread: 227.52 in 1969; 379.98 in 1974. Acetate yarn, 1,314 in 1969; 2,284 in 1974. Nylon fabric, 1570 in 1969; 4,155.77 in 1974. Acrylic fabric, 2,380 in 1969; 4,732 in 1974. And that is the way goods go. What does this mean? There is an inflationary process going on throughout the world. Some basic raw materials, such as petroleum, are being sold at very high prices. And the chemical industry has a heavy influence on the world's economy. There is a general shortage of foodstuffs in the world. Many of the products cannot be obtained, regardless of price, such as vegetable flour, fishmeal, powdered milk and others. But above all the prices of raw materials for industries have increased extraordinarily. However, the production of eggs has been maintained, the price of eggs has been unchanged through the years [presumably in Cuba]. The people still receive milk for the children at the same price at which it has been maintained through the years. Naturally, the economy must face all these cost increases. If the prices of imported goods are compared with the prices obtained for sugar based on the limits of the world market, it would be the equivalent of selling sugar for 3 cents [presumably per pound]. In fact, it was difficult to reach an agreement at the sugar convention because the importing countries wanted to set a top price that was unacceptable. We had to accept a top price for the sugar and then proceed to buy all these raw materials and goods according to those fabulous prices they [presumably the sugar importing countries] set. Therefore, there was no agreement. Thus it is an extremely complicated situation. It is not an easy situation. That is why we cannot say we solve the problem by importing goods to balance any wage increase granted. This is different from an objective limiting factor, and we must bear this in mind. The other data we have given you further emphasizes the need to seek economic efficiency at all costs and give force to all the criteria and viewpoints that you have analyzed in this congress. [We must] seek more production and better quality at less cost. A comrade said that the workers had participated in these discussions as true statesmen, and that is true. It is extraordinarily important that the workers consider these matters with extreme seriousness. In the battle to produce more and in better quality at less cost, all these facts point out the importance of working for the economy in general and on agriculture in particular. They point out the importance of working on the plans for sugarcane, livestock and rice. They point out the great importance of the enormous efforts by the unions in the tasks of saving and increasing production. This congress has adopted resolutions on participation by workers in the economic effort. One of the resolutions studied the necessity for the workers' participation in the proposals made by the leadership of the productive units, by enterprises and even by ministries. The party's [PCC] leaders are in complete agreement with this resolution of the workers' congress. But there is more: At the regular meetings of the Executive Committee of the Ministers' Council where proposals are studied and important administrative and economic decisions are made, we favored requesting participation by representatives of the workers' movement in the meetings of the Executive Committee of the Ministers' Council [long applause]. This makes a reality of an old revolutionary hope to give the organized workers maximum participation in economic spheres as befits a socialist process. You have reached another important agreement: To strengthen and maintain the action of the microbrigades on the basis that their work is the correct method and an adequate solution to the housing problem. [applause] Currently there are more housing units under construction than in any other year of the revolution. The majority of these housing units are being built by the microbrigades. If we only had more materials! With the agreement of the workers congress, with the labor force we would be able to liberate by applying those resolutions, [look at] the number of housing units, grade schools, children's circles and social buildings we could achieve through such work! Anyway, we must not feel discouraged. Significant investments are being made to expand the material basis of the construction works, in order to have more gravel, more cement, more rock, more sand, more materials of all types. The time will come when we will be able to give a renewed and greater impulse to construction works with the microbrigades to solve the housing problem. [applause] It is important that this movement does not languish. Those of you who are unfamiliar with it will be invited to visit and become acquainted with the development of Alamar, which is one of those being built. You will see who functional and spacious [the housing units are] and the social living conditions that are being created there by the workers for the workers, in a borough that the bourgeois and the capitalists had not even dreamed could have the facilities, the beauty and the spaciousness of this development [project] being built by the industrious hands of our workers. There is the risk that some work centers could make so mush progress and resolve the main problems and that this could damage the work spirit of the microbrigades. This would not be right. It would be indeed good for them to solve their housing problem, but it would not be good for this microbrigade to disband or to become discouraged. What is right is that when a microbrigade already has built such a number of housing units that the situation becomes less pressing for their work center, their proletarian spirit, their solidary spirit will go to work to build housing units for other labor sectors [applause] which, as is the case of the teachers, do not have a powerful construction force available because most of them are women--and they say they are overworked. I do not know how they are going to solve the housing problem. Of course, the day we have more productivity in construction and we liberate the labor force, we could also have state government brigades build housing units for such cases. In the same manner that we had brigades building for technicians because the technicians came and the least we could do was to give them housing, in the future, using prefabricated [elements], with a raise in productivity, we not only must work on housing with microbrigades, but we will have to have government brigades also contributing to the solution of the housing problem, particularly for those sectors that do not have the possibility of adopting the microbrigade plan because of the characteristics and nature of their labor force. That is why it is necessary that the microbrigades do not lose strength and we transfer this force, keeping it linked to its work center. We must prevent at all costs a rupture of ties between the microbrigade worker and the center because this link with the work center is the soul of the microbrigade. We have even reached a consensus regarding qualification, so that when persons are rated as constructor they may reap the benefits of this increase in their capability as a constructor at the microbrigade. When they have a salary that is below the level of that corresponding to them as qualified workers; that their qualification be borne in mind and their salary be raised, but we must not separate this worker from the work center. If we separate the microbrigade worker from the worker center we kill the microbrigade. We see no other solution, the day we are able to form state brigades we will build more housing units. But for the next 10 or 12 years at least we believe that the microbrigades will be the soul of housing construction. And of many other types of social constructions linked with housing. Of course, the day we have materials, the surplus forces of the sugar mills will be able to recommend to the labor movement to [word indistinct] to continue the microbrigade movement. Setting up contract wages for construction-type work has been discussed. There are times when the problem of a particular construction does not lie within the work force, but in the materials. To apply the contract wage formula it would be necessary to guarantee the materials. There is a plan now to experiment with a few priority constructions, and to begin to test his method of construction-type payments with these priority constructions. Constructions which will be built with guaranteed materials, because otherwise the contract-type payments would not be effective. These constructions have work force problems but no problems with materials because they have been accorded priority. According to the construction union, the construction sector is going to begin testing this constructive method. The problem of home electrical appliances has been discussed. We realize that the solutions you have arrived at are adequate. Of course, some contradictions have come up. One worker even said that those pleasant persons, who were well like by others [Castro chuckles] would luck out in some distribution. Well, I am sure this is an exception to the rule, as Comrade Lazaro said. Now, if the lucky one can deceive the masses, how far can he reach with the public official? Because if he who distributes is not the masses but an official, and if the masses can be exploited, when the masses make one mistake the official has made a thousand. [wild applause] Do you believe that the housing units being built by the microbrigades should be distributed according to a new procedure? [crowd shouts no] Of course, everything in life has its problems. Among other things we realize that this will mean additional work for the labor leaders. And of course for those products which begin to be available, there is no reason to distribute them at the assemblies: watches, pressure cookers [and so forth]. We should be vary happy that we no longer have to distribute them according to that procedure. When we get around to having a surplus of television sets; wonderful! More than 100,000 are already being distributed yearly. But the television sets have basically been distributed through the labor centers. These 250,000 television sets have wound up in the hands of workers' families. Regarding refrigerators, there is no oversupply but their number is increasing. We are going to continue distributing them through the labor centers. And then we we will start getting color television sets. The first color television sets will start to show up. Perhaps one day we will have motorcycles to distribute, or even--after other basic needs in the country have been taken care of--several thousand cars may one day be available [for distribution]. What does this mean? It means that some items will be scarce while we begin liberating ourselves. As long as the scarcity persists, however, preference must be given to the workers. In a people made up of workers there were several articles which were sold only in certain stores. This was very irritating. Once we find a better procedure--if we find one while maintaining the same principle--let us implement this more convenient procedure which will save you all that work at the centers. For the time being, however, do not give up those items you have selected. Bear with this work in the labor union sector [applause] until we find a better system, based on the same principles. Of source do not start thinking about cars too rapidly. The country is going to import some rental automobiles to replace the old junky vehicles which run through the streets of our capital, and which are very expensive. [applause] We are also going to import some cars for technicians. To sell vehicles to technicians who need them according to the type of work they do and to improve their output is not a privilege. I am sure you all agree to this. [crowd shouts yes] For example, doctors who are making house calls. The have been given cars at cost and on easy payment terms. They pay part of the maintenance and fuel costs. The car is theirs and they undoubtedly take good care of it. Besides, they drive the cars themselves and they are very thrifty. We give them also because these are luxury items and they must be distributed wisely, where they will yield more benefits to the country. I know you have never said so, but we are aware that the labor movement also needs some vehicles. [extended wild applause and cheers] Of course the arguments presented by Comrade Lazaro and by the labor leaders are very wise ones. When we asked them how many cadres of permanent and professionals they are going to have--and we are seriously concerned with not inflating the workers' movement payroll--they explained that sometimes they need three cadres when one would be sufficient as a result of [lack of] resources to work with. And this also came up in the discussion with municipal committees. We really understand that you must save up on cadres, you must have the greatest productivity. We do not promise you immediate solutions but we do assure you that throughout the year 1974 we are going to make an effort to give the workers movement the minimum indispensable automotive resources they need for their work [applause] and with a view toward increasing your output as working cadres. [applause] You have reached agreements about the qualifications; you even have a draft bill approved here in the congress, which in all probability will be made law by the Revolutionary Government. [applause] The matter of qualification is very important It is estimated that the workers movement has to qualify over 100,000 workers within the next few years, not counting the qualified workers who graduate from the polytechnical schools and the technological institutes, that is, out of the regular schools, as regards qualification, we will be able to do wonders in future years because the polytechnical schools and technological institutes are mushrooming all over the country. And each year we are going to give more emphasis to that sector: the schools. Around 150 polytechnical and basic high schools are being built in the country per year. That is, the equivalent of 150 units of 500 students. In the Oriente Province alone, in a single year, almost 20 polytechnical schools have been built in sugar centrals. In Arquitex the Textile Technological Institute has just been dedicated. And, in Ariguanabo the polytechnical school with room for 1,000 students will be opened in December alongside the factory. The material base for the professional training of our youth is increasing significantly. This same material base can be also utilized by the workers. They can be there as teachers, alongside the factories. The teachers can be used for the qualification courses. The multiple ways of cooperation between the worker movement and the qualification plans of the youth can be studied. As we said before the value of this congress is mainly that it is a first important and decisive step in the task of seeking the maximum efficiency of our economy. To seek the maximum efficiency of the economy becomes a fundamental task of the revolution in the coming years. [applause] A taks for the party, for the workers movement, for the youth organizations and for the mass organizations. Work is already being done in the preparation of the 76-80 plan which will be the first 5-year plan of the revolution [applause], and which in broad form will be approved by the first congress of our party in 1975 [cheers and rhythmic applause]. And this plan will unavoidably be a taut plan, a strong plan which will guarantee the progress of the country in the next few years. That will require the maximum effort from all of our people. We hope that th labor leaders will take part in the drawing up of that plan, that in the analysis and discussion of that plan all of our workers will participate. [applause] The economic battle is fundamental and that battle will only be won with the maximum participation of our working masses. It will also be necessary to strengthen the administration. Another one of the virtues shown by this workers process in which --as Lazaro said-- there was no evidence of any antiadministrative spirit. We expect the closest cooperation and working relationship between the two representatives of our people: You, the representatives of the workers who, with your hands create the riches, and the administratives, representatives of the socialist state. [applause] Representatives of the socialist administration, we have increased the administration budget; [applause] now the administration must be strengthened. Female and male comrades, our party feels proud of the results of this congress, of your work, of your successes. It has been an extraordinary proof of political and revolutionary maturity. It has revealed in all its depth the awareness of our working class. Today you chose the CTC leaders. The party was not alien to the nomination, but the party did not interfere saying who should be elected. The party interfered by asking the maximum leaders of the workers movement what the working masses' feeling was, what the labor unions' feeling was and what the feeling of the working leaders was about the nomination that would be presented to the congress. The leaders who today form the national committee, speaking on behalf of the workers, said unanimously that the Cuban workers feeling was that Comrade Lazaro Pena should be the CTC secretary general. [prolonged applause] Comrade Lazaro held an important post in the party leadership, but due to the extreme important that this workers movement has for the revolution, the party leadership accepted that Comrade Lazaro be nominated and work directly with this workers front. This election was carried out in a totally democratic way; a way that mirrors the feelings of the workers. This is the task of the party: to guarantee the democratic spirit of the process, to interpret and support the will of the masses and to orient that will toward basic problems. This election is, primarily, homage to a comrade who has devoted his entire life to the cause of the workers. [rhythmic applause] It constitutes recognition of this position as a teacher of the workers cadres [applause], because from what the labor leaders tell us, Lazaro has been like a teacher to them. During these months with him they have learned more about the labor movement and dealings with workers, and labor union matters than they had known in their entire lives. But it is also recognition of Comrade Lazaro Pena's extraordinary talent for dealing with and leader workers. [applause] Comrade Lazaro has been the soul of this process which preceded the congress, since the work on the projects to the actual holding of the congress. [applause] However, together with Comrade Lazaro Pena, a group of young labor leaders have been elected. Agapito will not take offense if I call him young too, because here, because of his enthusiasm we all consider him young. [applause] But there is a whole contingent of young cadres with wonderful qualifications, with a wonderful attitude, with a solid reputation among the workers, who, we feel certain, will learn much from Comrade Lazaro Pena. For this reason, one of Comrade Lazaro Pena's tasks will be to form in his style and through his example, this valuable contingent of young cadres who are the hope for the Cuban workers movement. [applause] We are pleased to see the way the congress has developed and we are pleased--highly pleased--by the comrades whom you have elected. We are deeply pleased by the democratic spirit of this workers movement, and we can state that, if we decided in 1970 to create a strong, a powerful workers movement, then deeply democratic, solid and indestructible bases for that workers movement have been laid today. [applause] The enthusiasm and the quality of the delegates who are attending this congress fills us with hope. We are deeply pleased with the assurance and the confidence with which they have acted, with which they have worked and with which they have spoken here; and we do not have the slightest fear of being in error when we state that our workers movement and our party have a magnificent repository of enthusiastic, hones and revolutionary fighters. [applause] Never before has our workers movement had such perspectives. Never has our workers movement been as solid as it is today. Thus, the revolution can count on another force. The party can count on one more force in the tasks it must accomplish. It will be your duty to continue on this road upward, to strive, to study, to prepare yourselves, to follow this magnificent tradition which you have set in this historic congress. This congress has been, moveover, magnificent proof of the internationalist spirit. Our workers have enthusiastically and decisively supported the cause and the struggle of workers all over the world. [applause] Here, in front of representatives from almost 70 organizations, you have expressed that internationalist spirit in the wonderful demonstrations of friendship, of affection and of solidarity with the USSR workers [applause] and with the workers of all socialist countries. [applause] You have expressed your unconditional support of the workers, the fraternal people of Chile, [applause] of the heroic struggle of the Arab peoples, [applause] of the dear people of Vietnam, [applause] of the fraternal people of Puerto Rico, [applause] of the fighters who struggle against neocolonialism, colonialism and racism in Africa. [applause] You have expressed your pride in the Cuban workers who in different parts of the world are fulfilling their internationalist duties [applause] in the medical teams which serve in the fraternal country of Syria [applause], in the construction workers who work in the Democratic Republic of Guinea [applause], in the doctors, technicians, teachers and others who are currently working in equatorial Guinea, or in Algeria, or in Yemen. [applause] You have expressed the wish that brigades of Cuban construction workers march to Vietnam [applause], as they will soon march with their equipment to contribute to the reconstruction of that fraternal country. [applause] These feelings honor us, honor our working class, and fill our party with satisfaction and hope, because without that internationalist spirit there could never be a communist conscience. [applause] Even though we are a small country and still a poor one, it cannot hurt us in the least to give some of our resources to aid other revolutionary peoples who are even poorer than we. Moreover, if a nation has the duty to aid others, that nation is one such as ours, which has known at close hand the fruits of proletarian internationalism [applause] and has been helped as much as we have [applause]. That Lenin's great country aided Cuba in decisive moments, with all its strength, it is only fair that we also help other revolutionary peoples as much as we can. [applause] However, this congress has also been a demonstration of magnificent internationalist spirit from another angle with representatives of almost 70 labor organizations gathered here. [applause] It is with real pride that we have seen representatives of the most prestigious and most solid organizations of the world labor movement file past this rostrum. We have had the pleasure of listening to the secretary general of the World Union Federation, Comrade Pierre Gensous [applause], and Comrade Aleksandr Shelepin, the chairman of the USSR All-Union central Council of Trade Unions and member of the CPSU Politburo [applause], who conveyed to us the sentiments of fraternity and solidarity of the Soviet workers. Leaders of labor organizations from the fraternal socialist countries, leaders of the labor organizations of Africa, Asia and Latin America and leaders of important international organizations have spoken before us. We have had the opportunity of hearing the moving and profound words by the representative of our fraternal Puerto Rican workers; we have heard the representatives of the Arab peoples, the peoples of Vietnam, Korea, and of the African workers. We have U.S. labor leaders here among us. The representatives of the heroic workers of Chile are present. [applause] Comrade Hortencia Bussi Allende has honored this congress with her presence [extended applause] and her daughter Beatriz. [applause] All of them have had exceptionally warm and affectionate words for us--words full of fraternal encouragement. As each of them took his place at the rostrum, we could see, as in on open book, just how far the solidarity of our people and our working classes has developed with the most just and most revolutionary causes throughout the world. [applause] Our country has fulfilled and will continue to fulfill its internationalist duties. In recalling those Cubans who are performing their duty in other lands, we must not forget our comrades of the Revolutionary Armed Forces who, in one way or another, are also doing their duty as technicians in various countries. [prolonged applause] This congress has dedicated special attention Chile. Workers throughout the world were urgently called upon today to show solidarity with the Chilean people and to struggle actively against the criminal fascist junta. [applause] We are sure that the labor movement throughout the world, particularly the labor leaders from European countries who so worthily and brilliantly represented their union organizations here--we are referring to the labor representatives from capitalist countries who are also here among us [applause]--we are sure that these labor leaders will take up that call as their own. [applause] Thousands of Chileans, and not only Chileans but also Latin American who were living in Chile, have been dragged in and out in prisons, persecuted, or expelled by the fascist junta. Many countries have offered them hospitality. Many of them wish to come to our country and reside here, as long as they cannot return to a liberated Chile or their own liberated countries. We have housing problems, but we propose here to the workers, to the participants of this congress, that the labor microbrigades in Havana offer an apartment in each building that they complete in the future to a Chilean or Latin American family. [prolonged rhythmic applause] There are almost 500 microbrigades in Havana. This would mean that in less than a year there would be 500 apartments for the use of those who come to reside here from the fraternal republic of Chile. [applause] We do not have much, but we gladly and with revolutionary spirit share the little we have with our Latin American brothers from any part of the continent who are being persecuted. [applause] Ladies and gentlemen: I have but to express to all the labor representatives present here our deep gratitude for your presence in this event, and to express to you all, on behalf of our party, our most profound gratitude and or most sincere congratulations for the success of this congress. [applause] Long live the Cuban working class! [vivas] Long live the internationalist proletariat! [audience cheers] Fatherland or death! We shall triumph! -END-