-DATE- 19771217 -YEAR- 1977 -DOCUMENT_TYPE- SPEECH -AUTHOR- F.CASTRO -HEADLINE- SECOND ANNUAL NATIONAL ASSEMBLY -PLACE- HAVANA'S KARL MARX THEATER -SOURCE- HAVANA DOMESTIC SERVICE -REPORT_NBR- FBIS -REPORT_DATE- 19771228 -TEXT- FIDEL CASTRO'S CLOSING SPEECH AT NATIONAL ASSEMBLY PA271542Y Havana Domestic Service in Spanish 0102 GMT 27 Dec 77 PA [Closing speech by Commander in chief Fidel Castro at a second annual ordinary session of the People's Government National Assembly at Havana's Karl Marx Theater on 24 December--recorded; first part of this speech was published on pages Q4-Q11 or the 27 December 1977 Latin American DAILY REPORT] They are harder in one sense, a material sense. In a moral sense they are more stimulating. But this generation has a duty, that of creating better circumstances and conditions for the coming generations. What our revolution has done is no small matter; far from it. We believe that the revolution has done extraordinary things, we have done extraordinary things. We have attained incredible advances. The truth of the matter is to know and be convinced at this time--not at this time in our revolution but at this time of our world--which are the tasks of our revolution. We are going to keep on growing. On some fronts we have arrived at such levels of investment that they do not have to be increased much more during the coming years. Let us look at the level of investments in roads, railroads, dams and transportation. These sectors do not require a considerable increase. The building of child centers, policy-clinics and hospitals are also at this level. Perhaps the hospitals require more investments, but they will not require considerable investments for years in the future. What I mean is that if we build 87 child care centers and increase them to 90, we could continue to build 90 for 10 years, and then we will have 900. They accumulate year after year. But this is a high level. The number of schools we are building will be sufficiently ample so that they will not require considerable expansion. If we use the figure of 120, then we will not have to increase to 130. No, if we build 120 schools per year, the total number would be impressive. We will have to build a few more. Perhaps for economic reasons we will have to build a few more, but this will be for economic reasons. That is to say, in many activities in these past few years we have reached such a reasonably high level that we will not need to expand them much more. Perhaps we will have to build a little more than 100, perhaps a theater [as heard] We must build that. There is a level which is higher, let us say. Which? Housing is higher. Then, where should we grow? In economic activities, industrial investments, we must grow in industrial investments. It is not that much in agricultural investments. It is true there is some in agriculture--clearing fields, new plantings, irrigation plans and so forth. These are the levels we have achieved. Building dams and microdams, we have advanced so much that in 13 more years practically all the country's rivers will be dammed. If we continue the pace we are following, by the year 1990 we can say that 100 percent of the country's rivers will be dammed. At our present rate we do not have to accelerate this. So, in many activities we have reached such a level that they do not require large increases; others do require them. Housing had to be sacrificed because of these plans. The problems are clear because the hours spent by this Assembly discussing housing demonstrates the magnitude of the problems. It demonstrates it, but it is clear that no matter how much we do--measures, agreements, directives, that the police does not permit this or that--we know that with them we will not solve the problem. With that, we avoid some cases of misconduct, which are always bad, but the solution of the problems is to build housing in adequate quantities, and I sincerely believe that our country is now arriving at the possibility. In the past we were limited by cement. We did not have enough, and the steel rods were not enough. We did not have enough tubing, tiles. We did not have enough of anything. Many industries of that type have been built. So now we can say: Let us solve the housing problem. In schools, we should have more or less what we now have. If we keep going at this rate, who knows how many schools we will have, that is, at the present rate. If we cannot place all the youngsters in the school in the countryside plan, we will keep them in the city and, whenever we are able to build more schools in the future for those intermediate level youngsters, those in the city will go to primary level. And when those of secondary level are sufficient, then we get started on the primary level. And when those of secondary level are sufficient, then we get started on the primary level. [as heard] We will have to increase the number of universities. In those new housing areas, we will have to build schools--primary schools and child care centers. But if we maintain the current levels in manual of the branches I referred to, then we can increase industrial investments and increase the housing investments, and commit ourselves to fulfill that objective. That is not an economic objective. Housing does not increase national production, but it is a tremendous need of our people. We must build new housing and provide maintenance for the existing ones. We must expand our housing construction rate until we reach the building rate per year that we need. Let us maintain our levels and increase them during the coming years. But also, we know that within a short time we shall reach the highest point we can reach. The population cannot grow much more, and in a short while it will decrease according to the demographic growth of previous years. The number of primary school students will decrease as the backlog of students decreases, but the number of university students will continue to grow considerably during the coming years. The number of beds in the hospitals will continue to increase, the number of health institutions will continue to increase, as well as the number of polyclinics, dental clinics, homes for the aged and so forth. The number of health centers will continue to increase and year after year we will be in a better situation. How can we increase our improvements? In the quality of the services, in the quality. By having reached the limit of students in grade and high schools-practically all the population in that age range--and having increased considerably in construction and so forth, we then have an unlimited field to expand on concerning the quality of education. By having available, at a given moment, all the polyclinics and hospital beds we may need, we then have an infinite percentage in the improvement of the quality of medical services. And so on: In all services; in the universities, the quality of superior education; in sports, the quality of the athletes; in culture, the quality of public presentations of every kind. Growth is not only measured quantitatively, but it must be measured qualitatively. Some services were not properly performed probably due to a little negligence. There are some factors that are negative, but there are many positive factors. That constant struggle so that a hotel guest is properly treated cannot be lessened. It must continue relentlessly. In a restaurant, in a cafeteria, in public transportation, it is a constant effort because such services must be improved in quality. [applause] Therefore, we must grow economically and develop our economy every year, not thinking about consumption but about giving solidity to our economy. We must invest our available resources not in consuming but in development, and grow not only in the percentage of material production but grow constantly in the quality of the services to the nation. We have a big problem. We must struggle constantly, tirelessly against negligence, against the bureaucratic tendency, against laziness, the same way we struggled and are struggling against crime. Measures have been taken and other measures are going to be taken, and we are going to continue fighting against crime. [applause] You the people are going to discuss the draft penal code. But even before the final draft is brought up for your consideration, a decree-law has been studied which provides certain types of punishments to facilitate the fight against crime in our institutions in the interior of the republic. We said crime must be defeated, and already the fight has started. We considered the need to improve the medical services, to avoid certain deficiencies, certain areas of negligence. An important campaign is already underway in that respect,and we must say that our answer for the medical personnel is the answer of our revolutionary people in every way. Since the 13th congress the matter of rest and days off for doctors has been studied. But what do we have? We have many graduating doctors and we also have a great demand for medical personnel in other countries, some very poor countries to which, naturally, we offer our assistance free. But we also have great demand for medical personnel in other countries that ask us for it and pay for it. This is a new field opened to the country. The possibility of exporting public services in something very interesting. This can be another source of income for a country such as ours which does not have oil. The demand for doctors increases. A total of 3,500 students enrolled this year in the school of medicine and the number of these students will continue increasing. Besides, if a country which has the means suddenly places a request for hundreds of doctors and is willing to pay the country the right fees for their services, it is wonderful to have the doctors available to meet that demand. What would have happened if the [doctors] performed their duty and rested before and after standing duty. Then hundreds, thousands of doctors would be needed for that. The doctors were faced with the problem of deficiency in their service, having to give up their day of rest after being on duty. We knew that it was not just, but it could be no other way. This situation was considered at the 13th workers congress and we began implementing it. Then new situations emerged. It was necessary to ask the doctors to make the effort, to bear with the situation, and the doctors' response was excellent. In many of the hospitals in the country they have given up postduty rest, rest after duty. Hundreds of doctors in the Calixto Garcia Hospital recently gave up their days off. [applause] This is the attitude we must have during these years. Yes, this is the attitude. Let us not consider whether what we have is just or not. The issue is that we need the doctors here and abroad, here for our own services and abroad for internationalist aid and also for economic cooperation. We need them in both aspects. The country needs them. Let us have thousands of students enroll in the school of medicine: 3,500, 4,000, 4,500 for the present and 6,000 or 7,000 later on. Comrades, let us keep up this work. We have many young comrades who want to study medicine. Let us open as many schools of medicine as needed. Then we will have the necessary doctors so that others can have their days off. But not at present. This generation has to make the sacrifice. This is precisely what we are talking about, about the effort and sacrifice that we must make now. We must deprive ourselves of so many things we would like to give the people. Who would not like to have 40 square meters instead of 20. Yes, there is scarcity of some articles such as towels, sheets and similar articles. When I talk about making a sacrifice to maintain levels, I do not forget about those items. But there are some critical levels which we must improve. The critical level of some basic goods, of some products must be improved, but, strategically, we must not think about developing consumer goods. Our doctors have set an excellent example, the same example as the students, the members of the pedagogic detachment, the internationalist detachment and the workers in the factories are setting. I want to let you know about this situation because these are real economic possibilities for the future. We will be in an excellent situation to carry out a 5-year plan. We shall have the conditions to make magnificent yearly plans, if we attain all the objectives assigned in the first congress. And we shall attain a large portion of these objectives, both economic and social. We can commemorate 30 December, the date of the taking of the Santa Clara armored train, with the fact that the central railroad from Havana to Santa Clara has been rebuilt. [applause] Next May we shall be able to travel along one half of the six-lane turnpike, half of which--three lanes--will be covered with asphalt, from Havana to Santa Clara. Our sugar production is improving. We are building large and secure houses. The level of our housing increases considerably and the area under irrigation increases considerably. New varieties of plants are being introduced. We are experimenting with new strains. All this is being done on very solid bases. Our sugar production will grow, a growth without retreat. This is very important. We shall have good harvest next year, but we shall need a better one in 1979 and a yet better one in 1980 and so on until the year 1990. This is being attained on very solid bases. We are making constant investments. We are beginning the first stages of the nuclear power plant. Soon we shall begin the first stages of the steel industry. We have important industrial objectives. These are already being attained. We are beginning them in this 5-year period in order to conclude them in the next. All the tasks assigned by congress in the economic field are advancing according to schedule. We are therefore creating very good conditions in spite of all these world difficulties. Our integration in the socialist camp grows, and our trade with it grows. It will continue to grow from 1980 to 1985, from 1985 to 1990. So, it is worthwhile that we make this effort, that we continue on this path, because this path offers very good possibilities. For all the sectors--administration, mass organizations and others--the year 1978 opens very good prospects. We already have good possibilities, but an effort will be needed to fulfill the plan agreed upon here. Therefore it will be very interesting on this date in the coming year when we shall be able to discuss how we carried out the 1978 plan and the plan we will have prepared for 1979. We are already working on this plan and we want all party members and deputies to the National Assembly to have the maximum amount of information and the maximum amount of participation concerning these activities, the maximum amount of understanding and consultation. I want all of you to be fully aware of the effort we must make and the policies we must follow [applause] on the firm and scientific bases. This is our duty as members of this revolutionary generation. It is our duty as deputies. The same thing happens with the budget. The first budget had been already made but the budget for the coming year, which we have estimated to the last cent, must be studied much more and made much more efficient, keeping austerity in our minds. Austerity means many things. It means to save, to resist the temptation to spend. The idea of a new type of candy, samples of which were taken to the Assembly, was proposed to us. We did not distribute them. [applause] We would have liked nothing better than to distribute the bags of candy, but we must save up to the last cent. Everyone should be careful of what he spends and on what he spends it. Let me give you our experiences in transportation. In the interprovincial service we are incorporating hundreds of men and 300 very modern buses. We now no longer have to ride standing up. From Santa Clara we need to build many stretches of road. Others will be built at the same time. Thus, we will have improved railroad and bus services in the country. We must improve our transportation. We must overcome this crisis in our capital city, but not with spectacular changes. We need thousands of men to make repairs and improve services. In spite of economic problems we have made several investments and will buy chassis in order to build these buses here. Returning to the budget, you have already seen the estimated amount of 9,159,000,000 pesos. Of this amount over 4 billion are dedicated to the production sector. Among the most interesting things of our budget are certain figures. For example, the budget for public health and education is 1,532,000,000 pesos. We also have other social and cultural activities such as social security, which has almost reached 600,000,000 pesos. Something which received attention was our expenses for defense and domestic order: 784,000,000 pesos. This means that we spend almost twice as much on education as we spend on defense and domestic order. This is very interesting and received attention because, in fact, there were so many sacrifices needed by our country to defend ourselves that many were surprised. If we consider that we have an as formidable defense as we must have, here we can measure the efforts our country makes in education and public health. These figures are exact and not a cent has been changed. This is what has been allocated to the sphere of education, health and what has been allocated to the area of defense and internal order, without fear. It is equivalent to almost 8 percent. But no, we are not afraid to say it: The imperialists forced us to develop powerful forces. And, of course, the effort we make in the area of defense is not measured in pesos or hundreds of millions. There is another kind of effort that is hard to measure; it is not capable of measurement--the human effort we sometimes make, the human effort. [applause] The tens of thousands, tens of thousands of youths who dedicate a part of their lives to the service; the thousands, tens of thousands of officers dedicated to the tense effort of being in the service. Then there are the minor specialists of our armed forces, our reservists, the hours and time they dedicate to combat training. That is worth more than 2 million, more than all the millions put together, but we do it gladly because imperialism has forced all of us to become soldiers. [applause] We have already spent more than 700 million in the area of defense and internal order. This includes all the defense activities carried out by the Ministry of Revolutionary Armed Forces and the Interior Ministry. In spite of everything, we will have the satisfaction of being able to say: Today we allocate almost twice as much to health and education. We have no doubts of any kind. If in order for the fatherland and the revolution to survive it had been necessary to spend twice as much on defense as on anything else, we would have spent twice as much on the country's defense as on anything else. [applause] We do not want concessions of any kind in connection with these issues. On an occasion such as today's many topics can be discussed. In our opinion these are the most important ones from the domestic standpoint. We should now refer to foreign policy; it is necessary and it would be advisable to point out certain things. How are relations with the United States doing? Well, they are doing a bit better. Of course, in the first place, imperialism has received many blows of all kinds. The economic blockade and its attacks against us are very unpopular and indefensible. They have no moral way of defending that policy against us. To tell the truth, in this struggle we have emerged as the victors. Soon the revolution will commemorate its 19th anniversary and we might very well say that it is still in its infancy. [applause] Or better yet, that it is still of kindergarten age. Their efforts to destroy the revolution crashed disgracefully against our people's firmness, our people's revolutionary spirit, our people's dignity and our people's heroism. They underestimated the Cuban people. They though it would be easy to play games with them, intimidate them, destroy them, demoralize them. But all of Yankee power--to use those words--was not enough to reach those objectives. Five Administrations came up against us--Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and ford--five former Presidents, but the revolution prevailed. [applause] There is new Administration now. As we have already said, it has made a few positive gestures. It has not been characterized by a policy of hostility toward our fatherland. In its electoral campaign it did not commit itself to an aggressive policy toward Cuba. It has made a few gestures and we in turn have made a few small gestures. Small gestures. But what big gesture could we make? None. But there have been a few marijuana smokers, U.S. citizens who were imprisoned here, and we facilitated their return to the United States. [We have also facilitated the return] of several of those who were imprisoned for counterrevolutionary activities. They set a 200-mile limit and we had no choice but to set a 200-mile limit. Then we had to discuss those 200 miles because we had traditionally fished in the waters that fell within the 200 miles they claimed. It became necessary to discuss this and certain agreements were reached. They authorized Americans to visit Cuba. Very well, we celebrated the reestablishment of the Americans' right to travel. That is a right and a law. They reestablished it and as a gesture we did not oppose it. Those who want to come, visit Cuba, may do so. They proposed the opening of an Interests Office. We analyzed this and agreed. They opened an Interests Office here and we opened one in Washington. These are some of the advances made. But what is the essential thing? The essential thing is the blockade. The immoral thing about this U.S. policy is that in its negotiations with us the United States is trying to use the blockade as a weapon. Speaking about gestures, we have not decreed any blockade against the United States, so we cannot make the gesture of lifting the blockade because we have not decreed any blockade against the United States. And we hope that this national Assembly does not decree any economic blockade against the United States. They are the ones who have to make the gesture of lifting the blockade. We cannot make the gesture of restoring a portion of the territory of Florida because we are not occupying any portion of Florida, but their troops are occupying a portion of our national territory. [applause] What gesture could we make? We still have a few old CIA agents in prison. Well, they will remain there for as long as necessary. We have made the gestures which were possible. I was saying that the immoral aspect of the U.S. policy is that it wants to use the blockade as a means of negotiations. I keep holding you there in a stranglehold and let us discuss, you in a stranglehold, and we can discuss. This is profoundly immoral on the part of the U.S. Government. This blockade involves even medicines. Not a single type of medicine or medical equipment can be purchased in the United States . They talk of paying compensation to the companies which were exploiting this country. They say that their properties were worth $2 billion. With interest this amounts to $4 billion. We have told them that all of the misdeeds, crimes, have represented $4 billion which, plus interest, add up to $6 billion and that we are prepared [applause] to admit the harm done to their enterprises if they admit the damage caused to Cuba. Let them pay to us an indemnification and we will pay indemnity to the U.S. companies which were affected by the revolutionary laws. Now than, there could be many other things about which one could talk. But, what happens, what happens? Previously, they talked about subversion in Latin America. They do not talk about this may longer. Now they say that we allegedly [Castro leaves though unfinished]... the problem of Puerto Rico's independence. They use as argument their theories, we use ours. But above all, I think this is a matter of principle. We do not promote violence in Puerto Rico, but when the Cuban revolutionary party was founded, it was founded to achieve independence in Cuba and Puerto Rico. [applause] We have sacred historical, moral and spiritual ties with Puerto Rico. We have said that as long as there is a single Puerto Rican who defends the idea of independence, as long as there is a single one, we have the moral and political duty of supporting the idea of Puerto Rico's independence. [applause] And we will fulfill this moral and political duty. We do not need that there be 3 or 4 million Puerto Ricans who defend independence. For us, one is enough. And we have said many times before that this is a problem of principle, and we do not negotiate principles. [applause] Now a new issue has come up: That of the Cuban soldiers in Angola and in Africa, and Cuba's solidarity with the African peoples, and we have said very clearly: Cuba's solidarity with the African peoples in non-negotiable. [applause] In no way does this mean that we reject the possibility of better relations between Cuba and the United States. We do this as a matter of principle. We sincerely believe that everybody's effort is necessary for international detente, for peace, because we do not believe that the world's only recourse is war, which means virtual extermination for humanity. We have talked about this at the congress. At the congress, this thesis was approved. It is a conviction which takes deeper root everyday, the conviction that the struggle for international detente and peace is a duty of all peoples and of all conscientious men in the world. So, the first, the fundamental, reason why we are willing to work for an improvement in relations in this principle. We know the world, we know its problems, we know the problems of the underdeveloped world. We foresee the terrible problems mankind will face, the mankind which is made up of our high school students, of the children in our childrens circles. We know the problems they will face in the future, the problems to be faced by the world of these children: nourishment, uncontrolled population growth, pollution, energy problems, scarcity of natural resources, the problems of development. We believe that without a true climate of peace these problems would not even begin to be solved. Therefore, we simply follow a principle, when we can, if there is a possibility of improvement. We must move and work in that direction, but apparently the U.S. Government does not understand this. Perhaps they imagine that we are impatient or anguished. Maybe they will develop the illusion that we cannot live without these relations. Perhaps they think that we want to improve relations because of economic or material interests. Naturally, in the economic aspect, that would be to our country's advantage. Materially, it would also be to its advantage, but in a relative rather than decisive way. Let this be understood clearly: It would not be decisive. It is our relations with the socialist community and with the USSR which are decisive. Those are decisive relations. [applause] And the United States will never be able to replace those relations despite its imperialist nature. What are they doing now with sugar? They impose enormous tariffs on sugar that is grossly devalued. The United States has imposed 3-or-4-cent tariffs on sugar--which in the world market is currently selling at 7 or 8 cents--in order to protect its own sugar production, thus affecting more than 60 countries, several of which very well deserve it. In truth we are watching from the sideline how these events are developing. Many of those who rushed like voracious beasts after Cuba's sugar quotas in the U.S. market, who sold their souls to imperialism to obtain a part of our quotas, who lent themselves to the maneuvers and crimes against Cuba in order to obtain a part of our quota, who flung themselves like wild beasts upon our quotas, are not getting their just deserts: The United States no longer has any quotas and the tariffs are extremely high. But such is the selfishness of capitalism and their protectionist laws. They protect themselves even if the world sinks. This is what they are doing with sugar. Would they do what the USSR does--which pays us magnificent prices for our sugar, which raises the price of our sugar every time the prices of the products it exports to us increase, which buys from us practically all the sugar we can produce, thus creating magnificent exchange relations. The most important thing in life, particularly in the revolutionary life, is to speak clearly. And the U.S. Government must know with absolute clarity that no improvement in the relations between Cuba and the United States will in the least alter the close ties between our people and revolution and the Soviet Union. [applause] The U.S. Government cannot deceive itself regarding this. No strategy based on such an idea will succeed. This is not one of those governments that can be bought or that sells itself. You know [who they are]. I do notwant to mention any names but I could mention half a dozen. Imperialism has played with several of those governments. Imperialism has played with several pseudorevolutions and has controlled several governments. It has dragged them away from the socialist bloc and into treason. It has bought them. But there is one government in this underdeveloped world, in this hemisphere, that the imperialists will never be able to buy or control, and that is the Cuban Government. [applause] The United States speaks of Cuban soldiers in Angola and of Cuba's solidarity with Africa. What does this have to do with the relations between Cuba and the United States? The United States speaks of soldiers in other countries, turning the presence of our soldiers in Angola or in any other African nation into an obstacle for relations. That is why I say that the U.S. Government apparently does not understand our policy or principles. It does not understand it. We consider it an act of bad faith into which the President of the United States has been dragged by some of his advisers--the recent press scandal and campaign in the U.S. press concerning the presence of Cuban advisers in the various African countries. Much of this information is false because they mentioned the presence of advisers in some countries where there are none. They did mention some in which there are Cuban advisers, but also exaggerated the number in some cases. This was done, in our opinion, in an obvious attempt to blackmail Cuba. What moral authority has the United States to speak of Cuban soldiers in Africa? What moral authority can a nation have whose soldiers are on all continents, which as 20 military bases in the Philippines, dozens of bases in Okinawa, Japan, Asia, Turkey, Greece, the FRG, Europe, Spain, Italy, and everywhere? What moral authority has the United States to use the argument of our soldiers in Africa when their soldiers are on Panamanian territory by force, occupying a portion of that country? What moral authority has the United States to speak of our soldiers in Africa when their soldiers are in our own national territory, at the Guantanamo Naval Base? [applause] If we are going to talk about soldiers who are stationed where they should not be in connection with Cuba and the United States, the only soldiers who can be mentioned are the ones stationed at the Guantanamo Naval Base. On the subject of soldiers in other countries, this is the only point we can discuss. It would be ridiculous for us to tell the U.S. Government now that in order to establish or improve relations between Cuba and the United States it would have to withdraw its soldiers from the Philippines, or Turkey, or Greece, or Okinawa, or South Korea. If it wants to withdraw them from South Korea, let it do it whenever it wants. But it would be ridiculous for us to tell the United States that it has to withdraw its soldiers from the FRG, otherwise there can be no relations; or to tell it that we are very unhappy over the soldiers it has over there in the FRG, that there can be no relations [because of it]. They would then say: This guy is crazy. Then, why do they not say it? Because they cannot say it, because they cannot base themselves on equity or equality of any sort. It is the imperial preeminence, imperial preeminence. The imperialists can have soldiers and advisors everywhere in the world and we cannot have them anywhere. This is the United States' concept of equity and equality. In Africa we support governments that have requested our cooperation. They are constituted governments, revolutionary and progressive governments. Our military advisers are not with any fascist government anywhere in the world. Our advisers are not with any reactionary government anywhere in the world. Our military advisors are with governments which help the people and support the people. They are revolutionary or progressive [governments]. [applause] We do not have military advisers in countries like Chile, to cite one example, has military instructors and advisers in scores of countries and, in some places, by the thousands, like in Iran, Saudi Arabia and places like that. The United States has military advisers in almost all Latin American countries. The United States sent military advisers to and formed the armies of the most repressive, most bloody and most reactionary governments of this hemisphere. The fundamental difference between U.S. advice [and Cuba's] is that the United States will never provide advice to a revolutionary and progressive people and in general will always advise reactionary and fascist governments, while revolutionary Cuba provided advisers to revolutionary an progressive governments. What right does the United States have to impugn that advice of our people? Why do they complain? They tried to isolate and destroy the revolution. The revolution developed its ties with the Third World and these ties are solid and we will be firm and loyal with those ties. We will not exchange those ties for a smile from the United States. We will not exchange those ties for any concession which the United States might make. Those ties are not negotiable. We have soldiers, many soldiers and very good soldiers, and we have tens of thousands of officers, comprising regular and reserve officers, and we have hundreds of thousands of combatants, comprising regular and reserve soldiers. They of Yankee imperialism are to be blamed for this because their acts of aggression and blockade forced us to take these measures. And we do not deny it. We support and we have sent military advisers to numerous countries in Africa. That is clear, very clear, and we do not negotiate concerning that. [applause] This has nothing to do with the new U.S. Administration. It is the traditional policy of our revolution. We are helping and will help Angola. [applause] We are helping and will help Mozsambique. [applause] We are helping and will help the Ethiopian revolution. [prolonged applause] If because of this the United States blockades us, let it blockade us. Why does not the United States blockade South Africa, a racist, fascist country whose soldiers commit crimes in Africa, whose minority oppresses 20 million blacks? Why does it not blockade Rhodeisa, where 300,000 white fascists oppress 6 million Africans, a country whose soldiers perpetrate indescribable massacres of men, women and children in Nozambique? The photographs of the graves of the children, women and the elderly assassinated like Hitler's fascists used to do appeared over there. Why does it [Unreadable text] blockade it? Why do not the Yankee imperialists blockade Pinochet? They blockade Cuba, and that is what the people understand. That is what the African peoples understand, because while the Yankee imperialists are on the side of South Africa, Rhodesia and African repressive and reactionary governments, we are on the side of the revolutionary and progressive people of Africa. We struggle against fascism in Africa, we struggle against racism in Africa. Historically, while our role is a highly honorable one, the role of imperialism is a shameful one, and the peoples of Africa trust us and request our cooperation. And we are not only helping the governments of Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia and other African government, but also we are helping the liberation movements of Namibia, Zimbabwe and South Africa. [applause] We are helping them and we will help them, [applause] and imperialism has lost the battle beforehand in southern Africa. It does not matter what it does. Our policy is diaphanous and clear. We do not negotiate on principles. We do not allow ourselves to be intimidated by any type of campaign or by pressure of any sort. For the reasons outlined this afternoon, we are sincere supporters of peace and we want a principle--the struggle for better relations among all countries based on principles. No material benefit, regardless of its type or magnitude, would make us betray the trust of the peoples of Angola, Mozambique and Ethiopia, or the heroic peoples who are struggling against fascism and racism in Africa. And those things must be very clear to the United States. We have responded with positive gestures within our capabilities to the positive gestures of the current [United States] administration. But if the U.S. Government were to insist on a policy of blackmail against us and of pressure, a policy of immoral conduct toward our country, maintaining its blockade as a dishonorable and criminal weapon against our people; if the U.S. Government believes that in order to improve relations our people must abandon their principles; then, in the same manner that we have struggled against five U.S. Presidents, we will struggle against the sixth U.S. President. [prolonged applause] If they insist on maintaining the blockade, it will be worse for them because as long as we have more blockade we will also have more soldiers. [applause] As long as they carry out more acts of aggression against our homeland, our homeland will have more and more hardened soldiers. The confidence which revolutionaries throughout the world have in our people is an immense honor for Cuba. That is why our country will host the 11th [World Youth and Student] Festival next year. That is why our country will host the nonalined countries conference in 1979. [applause] Revolutionary life has assigned our homeland these tasks and we will fulfill our principles and our obligations. If the blockade goes on, it does not matter. If the U.S. Government casts aside the possibilities for improving relations with us, that is their problem. Sometimes they even (?meddle) in in the domestic affairs of our country. They speak of counterrevolutionary prisoners. Of course, they were the ones responsible for those prisoners because they encouraged the counterrevolutionaries in the same way that they encouraged plane hijackings, in the same way that they encouraged acts of terrorism, in the same way that they encouraged the plans to assassinate leaders of the Cuban revolution. The United States does not have any moral right to even look at this country face-to-face because of the crime it has committed against our people. And now privacy has turned against them, terrorism has turned against them. And there you have it, the terrorists now want to rule the United States and to bomb U.S. firms that have relations with Cuba, or the airlines that want to fly to Cuba. They raised ravens and the ravens are plucking out their eyes. In the same way they encouraged banditry and the counterrevolution in our country and the counterrevolutionary worms. The counterrevolutionary criminals thought that someday they [the United States] were going to get them out of jail. They did not get them out of jail. We were the ones who freed thousands and thousands of counterrevolutionaries through rehabilitation plans, work plans, remunerated work plans, and the truly humane plans of the revolution. Let us say that we still have in our prisons not even 20 percent of the revolutionaries... [Castro corrects himself] of the counterrevolutionaries that we had in prison. Not even 20 percent. And there were times when we had more than 15,000. And we say it because our revolution always was very clear and very clean. Torture was never allowed in the revolution. A crime was never committed in the revolution. There have have been missing persons in our country, there has never been a state of emergency, and so forth and so forth. There never has been a battalion moved to battle against workers, or against peasants or against students. The people were in the streets, true, they have always been in the streets, but with the revolution. [applause] The U.S. allies in this hemisphere make people disappear by the thousands. They torture and murder. This does not prevent the United States from trading with them, facilitating credits to them, selling weapons to them, sending them military advisers. We had revolutionary laws and rigorous laws, but a man was never penalized in this country without the action of a revolutionary court and without it being under the provisions of revolutionary laws. The conduct of our revolution has been truly irreproachable in its methods and procedures. From time to time, they [the United States] like to remember some known counterrevolutionaries who are in jail; and some politicians in the United States are concerned about the counterrevolutionary prisoners. On the other hand, they do not say a single word about the heroic Puerto Ricans like Lolita Lebron and others who have spent more than 25 [years] in the filthy jails of the United States. [prolonged applause] They speak of counterrevolutionary prisoners who, instigated by the imperialists, committed crimes against our homeland, and they do not speak of tens and tens of thousands of blacks who have ended up in the U.S. jails, for unemployment and man are to be blamed. They like to say that we should free the counterrevolutionary prisoners. We say to them: Yes. You set free the thousands of North American blacks who, because of the system of exploitation, hunger, poverty and unemployment in the United States, had to go to jail, and we will then be willing to free all the counterrevolutionary prisoners that remain in Cuba. [applause] What is this about their imposing conditions on anyone? of telling a country what it should or should not do to convert this country into one of fakes? And the curious thing is that many of those who are concerned about these counterrevolutionaries were responsible for the war in Vietnam and for the murder of millions of Vietnamese. They were accomplices of scores of repressive and reactionary governments in the world which have slain hundreds of thousands of revolutionaries. What moral right do they have to speak about counterrevolutionary prisoners in Cuba and what moral right do they have to speak of human rights? We are conscientious and well-educated revolutionaries. We are not deceived by slogans of any sort. Carter speaks about human rights. The supreme test of the existence of the slightest sincerity of his words is the question of the blockade of Cuba. He can speak of human rights, but no government which maintains a criminal blockade, an attempt at starving to death millions of human beings... [can speak of human rights]. Let it prove it with deeds because, I repeat, the question of the blockade of Cuba is the test for the existence of a minimum of sincerity in his words. And this minimum of sincerity can exist subjectively, but not objectively. How can anyone objectively raise the human rights banner in a country where there is a capitalist society par excellence, an exploiting class par excellence, a society where millions and millions of Mexican descendants are discriminated against, where the Puerto Ricans--who number in the millions in the United States--are discriminated against and despised, where Latins are despised, where the Indians are exterminated, where tens of millions of blacks are discriminated against. How can anyone in that country objectively raise the banner of human rights? No one deceives us in the least with that slogan. Imperialism has nothing left. It has no slogan to wield, it only has words left to see which unwary people it can deceive in this world. Let us stop this nonsense. If we speak between ourselves we know that we have two quite different systems, that we are very different. If some day relations are going to exist between our two countries, they will have to be relations of respect and equality. And we are willing to have them, knowing that we are and will be two very different systems. Moreover, we indeed know what humans rights are, since in our fatherland we eradicated the crimes and injustices that were committed every hour, every minute and every second; we eradicated gambling, prostitution, discrimination, unemployment, when we created people's government a real people's government, this government; when we created the bases of this beautiful revolution in which there has existed such a total identification between the people and the party and the leadership. This is a real democracy. This Assembly is democracy. [applause] These discussions indeed are democratic. [applause] (?On the other hand,) what exists in the United States is a government of the oligarchy, by the oligarchy and for the oligarchy; and in our country the government is of the people, by the people and for the people about which Lincoln spoke. In the United States, the government is of the bourgeoisie, by the bourgeoisie and for the bourgeoisie; and in our fatherland exists the government of the workers, by the workers and for the workers. [applause] In political matters, the United States would have to learn much from us and we, on the other hand, have nothing to learn politically from the United States, because they belong to prehistory...to the prehistory of human society and we belong to history since, as Marx said, when the real history of human society begins the system of man's exploitation by man disappears. [applause] We are politically and socially a century ahead of them. That is the reality. They began to become independent when we were a Spanish colony, back toward the end of the 18th century, they began before we did, but we have advanced more rapidly then they have. Not even the capitalist trash can compare with the truly human and truly fraternal essence of socialism. [applause] Imperialism is ideologically very weak and it is economtically undergoing an insurmountable crisis. I mentioned to you earlier what in our judgment was the policy which we should follow in the next 7 or 8 years, the country's future development policy based on our structures. It is not a consumption policy. That is how we will be building a certain future. If the blockade goes on for 10 more years, it does not matter. If the blockade goes on for another 50 years, it does not matter. [applause] It does not matter. The Government of the United States should understand this very clearly. And when these things are sufficiently clear for the Government of the United States and its advisers, the real and objective criteria will then exist upon which we can discuss, we can negotiate, we can trade and we, the United States and we, can have diplomatic relations. From the international viewpoint, these were the essential issues I wanted to explain to you today. Our revolution will soon be 19 years old. We have not been too prone to hold celebrations or fiestas. We have many celebrations. The triumph of the revolution was an extraordinary event, but we tend to celebrate it solemnly and in a deeply-felt manner. Actually, on the eve of this 19th anniversary, we can feel proud of and satisfied with the work of our revolution. [prolonged applause] I have never before seen so clearly and optimistically the future as I have on this eve of the 19th anniversary. I wanted to share with you today these feelings of satisfaction, pride and optimism. And I am certain that we will continue ahead of these outlined paths, struggling with courage, integrity, heroism, consolidating what we have done and enhancing the work of the revolution so that the future generations can feel proud of us. Fatherland or death! We shall win! [prolonged applause] [After Fidel Castro's speech at the National Assembly, National Assembly President Blas Roca then declared the Assembly session closed.] -END-