-DATE- 19900129 -YEAR- 1990 -DOCUMENT_TYPE- -AUTHOR- -HEADLINE- 16th Workers Federation Congress Closes -PLACE- CARIBBEAN / Cuba -SOURCE- Havana Cubavision -REPORT_NBR- FBIS-LAT-90-020 -REPORT_DATE- 19900130 -HEADER- BRS Assigned Document Number: 000001925 Report Type: Daily Report AFS Number: FL2901004990 Report Number: FBIS-LAT-90-020 Report Date: 30 Jan 90 Report Series: Daily Report Start Page: 1 Report Division: CARIBBEAN End Page: 11 Report Subdivision: Cuba AG File Flag: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Language: Spanish Document Date: 29 Jan 90 Report Volume: Tuesday Vol VI No 020 Dissemination: City/Source of Document: Havana Cubavision Report Name: Latin America Headline: 16th Workers Federation Congress Closes Subheadline: Castro Speaks Author(s): President Fidel Castro Ruz during closing session of 16th Congress of the Cuban Workers Federation, CTC, at the Karl Marx Theater in Havana--live] Source Line: FL2901004990 Havana Cubavision in Spanish 0208 GMT 29 Jan 90 Subslug: [Speech by President Fidel Castro Ruz during closing session of 16th Congress of the Cuban Workers Federation, CTC, at the Karl Marx Theater in Havana--live] -TEXT- FULL TEXT OF ARTICLE: 1. [Speech by President Fidel Castro Ruz during closing session of 16th Congress of the Cuban Workers Federation, CTC, at the Karl Marx Theater in Havana--live] 2. [Text] Distinguished guests, comrade delegates to the 16th Congress: 3. Some of you may perhaps wonder if I am very moved as I walk up to this podium, but I am not, because it is impossible for me to be more moved than I have been these past few days. The entire congress, we may say, has been a cause for unending emotion that culminated last night with the united march of workers, students, and the people at large from the university stairs to the monument of Jose Marti, whose birthday--as we all know--is being commemorated today. 4. We have participated in all labor congresses since the victory of the revolution. Hence, we are in a position to evaluate the changes that have taken place. On this occasion, we are fully aware that we are at a labor congress that is in line with the most decisive stage of the history of the revolution. The previous congresses were held under normal conditions, but this congress is taking place under exceptional conditions. Something I have noticed from the very beginning of the congress has been the extraordinary combativeness of the delegates, as well as the spirit that prevails here. I believe it was an excellent idea to have you wear your militiaman uniforms. I have also noticed that there is a new generation of union cadres, much better prepared and much better trained representatives of the working class; representatives who are much better educated and much more politically oriented, who are much more conscientious and who are as revolutionary a group of delegates as we have had in any time in our history. 5. This congress is being held amid worldwide confusion. You do not know how important it is to have a clear mind and clear ideas at a time of universal confusion. I do not know if it would be completely correct to speak of universal confusion since the confusion is taking place primarily in the progressive field, in the truly democratic field or in the field of truly democratic ideas, in the field of socialist ideas, in the field of revolutionary ideas, because the imperialists are not confused. The capitalists are not confused. They know perfectly well what they have in their hands and they know perfectly well what is at stake at this very moment in the history of mankind. Yesterday afternoon I was reflecting on these issues, first when the guests were not present and then, on another occasion, in the presence of our guests. 6. I asked myself: Will they comprehend this congress? Will they understand what is happening here? Will they perhaps think: A large group of fools is meeting here-- people without criteria, without thoughts, a group of cowards who are incapable of presenting their ideas or their nonconformist views, or of categorically demanding certain rights or certain prerogatives? Will they think that our congress is democratic or not? There were even some who were surprised, while others were amazed, that a number of Politburo members were present here, at this congress, and wondered if this might limit the delegates' freedom, if this would inhibit them from expressing their thoughts, because, of course, this is something unusual. 7. This is not what happens in the world, let alone what happens in the capitalist world, from where many of our guests have come. Do not forget that when I speak of the capitalist world, I am talking about two capitalist worlds: the developed capitalist world of the consumer societies which became rich by looting the world for centuries, in addition to looting their own working class; and the underdeveloped capitalist world, made up of former colonies which were also looted for centuries and which today find it virtually impossible to develop. 8. In these countries, all the ministers do not meet to hold a dialogue with the workers. The entire government does not meet to give an account of its actions to the workers' representatives, to answer every question from every delegate. This cannot be seen, nor will it ever be seen, in a capitalist country. What is sadder, it has not always been true in all the socialist countries, those that have divorced themselves from the masses. One also does not see the leaders of such governing parties present at workers congresses to give an account of their actions and to explain and answer questions from delegates. 9. That is why this unusual occurrence drew the attention of some, with satisfaction; of others, with suspicion; and for a few, with extreme suspicion, a feeling which stems from this time of extreme suspicion in the world. It was also unusual to see the working class, the representatives of the working class, concerned above all with each and every detail of production, with some very simple things, because this was not a congress of capitalist owners. 10. It is a meeting of enterprises, and in a bourgeois society, the representatives would be discussing all the details and problems of production, including technology. They would discuss what to do to save raw material, energy, resources, to recover a spare part, to make people work with discipline and efficiency in every production and service activity, to make people work with capitalist efficiency. In an owners meeting in a socialist republic, they would have to act like they act at a meeting of capitalist owners. The owners of the wealth of the country are here. The owners are here. [applause] 11. No one spoke on behalf of the United Fruit Company. No one spoke on behalf of the companies that were owners of the nickel enterprises. No one spoke on behalf of the electrical, telephone, or railroad companies. No one spoke on behalf of the dozens and dozens of companies and monopolies that were owners of the sugar mills, on behalf of the hundreds or a few thousand large owners of our lands, mines, or factories. Not a single one of them was heard here. 12. The owners themselves might not speak at a workers congress in a capitalist country. Those who speak will be the workers, the exploited people, those who give an elevated rate of increased value per work hour. The marginal people, the oppressed, the enslaved are the ones who speak. 13. Only after a socialist revolution, the concept of worker and owner--of the worker as owner of the country's wealth--has identified the same person, not in the sense of the owner of an enterprise, or the collective owners of a factory--an idea that some have surreptitiously attempted to introduce in the socialist ideology--but as owners of all of the enterprises and as owners of the country's total wealth. This is the only true sense that socialist ownership can have. Socialist ownership is not just the ownership of certain means of production by a collective of workers. 14. I have always believed and will always believe that there can be no other concept of socialism but the ownership by all the people of the means of production. Only in this way can we have a congress like this one, only in this way [applause] because, otherwise, what we would have would be contradictions and struggle among owners of means of transportation, among owners of factories; we would not have the widely known port transportation-domestic economy network, but war among ports, transportation facilities, and domestic economy. In our opinion, private ownership by groups is not and will never be a form of socialism. It will never be something more than a form of capitalism by groups. This is our view, but we respect--it goes without saying--those having different views of socialism. 15. Our guests have seen here how this congress has proceeded and how each delegate hs fought for the interests of the people, for the interests of the entire society. Apart from this, each delegate can express the specific problems of one sector, as was done here time and again. As an example, we can mention transportation and its problems, the ways to organize transportation so that it can benefit the economy, so that it can benefit the people; or problems dealing with construction, agriculture, sciences, and techniques. It would take a long time and would be unnecessary to repeat here the topics discussed during this congress. 16. Where else in the world but within a deep socialist revolution could one hear that phrase that has time and again been heard here: We have not come here to ask. In which strange place, on which planet, in which corner of the world can one hear the phrase we have not come here to ask but to give, in a congress of workers? 17. It is natural that this may have made some guests get the impression that instead of riding a plane they were put on board a rocket and sent to another planet. [applause] This is the way our congress has been carried out. 18. But it was something more than that. It was a congress that breathed internationalism, that breathed revolutionary spirit, that breathed patriotism, determination, and a willingness to fight from every pore. A congress that breathed the unity of our people from every pore. [applause] 19. Unity, unity--what a strange thing. To many in this world, it must also seem like something from other planets, from another planet. Anyone who reads the press will understand this. Political processes are taking place in fragmented societies because they are being fragmented, following the well-worn paths of Western capitalist philosophy. This must be obvious to anyone who sees--as one cannot help but see--10 parties, 15 parties, 25 parties, 35 parties, 40 parties in an election-- so many parties that are really and truly parties at a single point--split down the middle. [play on the word ``partidos'', which means ``split'' as well as ``parties''] [applause] 20. So it goes down the line. What a great thing it is for imperialism, which has a single party, even though it may be disguised with the symbol of a donkey, I think, or an elephant, and other parties with other symbols. They are experts in this--you should know this. But it really is the party of capitalism, the party of imperialism, the party of the monopolies, the party of the transnationals, in which the policies of the different parties are virtually indistinguishable, because the great crimes are supported by both so-called parties in unison. The Grenada invasion was applauded by both parties. The criminal war against Panama was applauded by both parties, by the two so-called supposed parties. The cold war, the arms race, and all the crimes committed by the imperialists for so long have always received the support of the sole party of imperialism and capitalism. 21. How great it is that our peoples and our societies have been broken into a thousand pieces. They have such extraordinary facilities to keep our societies underdeveloped, subjugated, dominated. The imperialists would give anything to maintain the people divided into 2 or 3 pieces, into 100 pieces. How easy it would then be to land here and impose their boots [botas] in the heart of our people. How wonderful it would be for the imperialists if such a thing occurred in this small country, which with so much energy, bravery, and determination has opposed such a scenario for so many years without the empire being able to conquer it. That is why we stress unity so much, and that is why, when I was talking with a group of European parliamentarians recently and they brought up this subject, I told them: Our Warsaw Pact and NATO are the unity of the people. [applause] 22. This small country has defended itself with this unity, and with this unity it will continue to defend itself against the reactionary and aggressive imperialist colossus we have for a neighbor. We will never permit anything to weaken or divide our people. Let there be no doubts about it: This unity is the foundation of our revolutionary ideas and the most just social concept ever known to humankind, the social concept of socialism and communism. [applause] In these times, when the mention of socialism seems to be a crime and when the mention of communism is an even bigger one, we must say that word out loud, we must say that word out loud. [Crowd shouts: ``Communism!''] 23. A few minutes ago [CTC Secretary General Pedro] Ross said that not all the delegates to this congress are communists. I would phrase it differently. I would say that not all the delegates are members of the Communist Party of Cuba [PCC] [applause] or the Union of Young Communists [UJC]. [applause] However, all the delegates I have seen here are communists. [applause] Our people are communists even though only some are members of the PCC and the UJC. What would a communist party do without a communist working class? What would a communist party do without a communist people? [applause] 24. We have analyzed our problems. We are not here today to attend an unusual performance. We have attended every session of the CTC congress precisely because we want to know how our workers feel, what they want, and how they feel our problems should be solved. We have come here to find out what it is we have to do in the next few months; we have come here to draft our agenda for the next few years, months, and days. Our agenda will be based on the information we have received, the resolutions that have been approved, and debates that have been held. This is why the party directorate--not all the members of the directorate--and the government have been present at these meetings. Every single government member has been present at these meetings; not a single minister or vice president of the Executive Council has missed a meeting--that is why whenever an issue was discussed or answer sought, we did not have to send someone to find them in their offices. In this country, where there are so many important things happening, where there are many mass organizations, what could be more important to us than this labor congress? 25. We have discussed and analyzed the problems and the measures we should take as if we were living in normal times. Of course we have to strive toward normal times. We have to work every day, at all times, and we have to make our schedule, our plans; however, this does not mean that these times are normal. We have all been aware that the times we are living in are not and cannot be normal. We are very aware, and we must be more so every day, that we are living in uncertain times. We have discussed here what to do with the batteries, how to save fuel, how to save everything, how to carry out the plans, but we do not know if this saving we have talked about will be sufficient. Who knows what we could do in normal times, in both the economic and military spheres, in both the economic sphere and with the international situation? 26. We have no doubt that we are making greater efforts to do things well. We do not have the least doubt that we are rectifying many things, and in the way in which we must--not hastily, not thoughtlessly, not in an improvised way, but by taking solid steps in each of the fundamental aspects of the country's life and the country's development. If we had no doubt that we were making greater efforts than ever, if we had no doubt that the coming years would pass under the same international conditions in which entire 5-year periods passed, working as we are working today, we could do practically anything we met up our minds to do. 27. It is not that previous years were not productive. No. We were analyzing some simple figures. Electricity, for example, today reaches almost 90 percent of our population, and will exceed 90 percent this year. Our production of materials, of cement--we discussed how to save this product yesterday. From about 700,000 tons, today we produce almost 4 million tons, to invest in the country's economic and social development. 28. In the same way, we could talk about many areas, and what has been done in those areas, in any sector: in the merchant marine, where from a few ships, a few old ships, today we have an entire fleet, which, however, is still not sufficient; the building of highways and roads, which has exceeded 30,000 km in these years of the revolution, and I am giving a conservative figure. Or the dams--the reservoirs that we have mentioned--have multiplied the country's water storage capacity by more than 100 times; nevertheless we are now building more of these dams than ever, and in a more integrated way than ever, plus the major canals [canales magistrales], plus the irrigation systems, etc. 29. It is not that these have been lost years, not at all: Today there are practically no young people who start jobs in industry or in the surface sector who have not completed 12 years of school, in a country that formerly had 1 million illiterate people; almost 300,000 professors and teachers, in a country in which almost half the population had no classrooms or teachers; the indexes of health our population has now. 30. We have heard of entire provinces that have an infant mortality rate lower than 10 percent. In some places like Guines, where there is no family doctor, the infant mortality rate rose only 5 percent per 1,000 live births. We have made enormous advancements in many areas, despite the deficiencies, the errors, the negative tendencies. We are overcoming this. We are overcoming these errors, these deficiencies. We are doing things with much more common sense, and above all, we are doing things by using our own heads. With our own heads, we are interpreting revolutionary ideas, the possibilities that are available today. We are making a much more solid and promising revolutionary effort. This cannot be compared with any other moment in the history of the revolution. This precise moment is one of the most uncertain and problematic times in the international area that we have known during the past few years of the revolution. 31. For decades, our plans, our 5-year and annual programs, were based on the existence of a socialist field, on the existence of several socialist countries in East Europe, in addition to the USSR, with which we signed accords, agreements, and with which we established extensive economic relations. We developed markets for our products, sources that supplied us with important equipment, and various types of merchandise. We made an effort in that direction, an effort to integrate and complement our economy. 32. That socialist field does not exist in a political sense today. We will not lie to ourselves. We will not tell our Pioneers that the socialist field still exists and that everything is wonderful in those countries. We have to continue to call them something. We will call them the countries of the socialist field. If we call them countries from the socialist field, we are not saying former socialist countries or countries of the exsocialist field. A socialist field is a group of integrated countries with certain political positions, with development programs, and with long-term possibilities. 33. CEMA exists. God help us if I say that the CEMA does not exist! I can see Carlos Rafael Rodriguez [vice president who attended the most recent CEMA meeting] sitting in the corner. 34. CEMA continues to exist; it continues to formally exist. In fact, people are fighting to maintain that institution. People are fighting for it. Our country has joined the battle to maintain the institution or at least, at least [repeats himself], a group of countries than can coordinate certain economic activities in reference to the common interests created over several years, in regard to common economic needs that exist between those countries. We could create an association. It can be maintained and we have to fight to maintain it. That is our duty as CEMA, as an economic organization. Of course, there have been changes in CEMA. It was customary in the CEMA to call those attending the meeting ``comrades''; now the word ``comrade'' has been abolished by a few members. CEMA representatives are not called ``comrades''. They are called ``gentlemen'' and ``ladies'' or ``Miss,'' if there is one there. [laughter, applause] 35. The terminology will change. The declared purposes of some of these countries is to construct capitalism. Some of them are constructing capitalism. In the majority of these countries, there are strong procapitalist currents. They speak of markets, private properties, and market economies. Combine private property with a market economy and you will have capitalism, or you will have a system conducive to the construction of socialism. Such a system has been declared in some countries, and the U.S. advisers are right there promoting the construction of capitalism. 36. The anticommunist feeling grows more and more in some of these countries. We could say that in almost all of them, with the exception of the USSR, there is a strong and growing anticommunist feeling. In almost all those countries, demands are first of all being made to abolish the constitutional article that establishes the vanguard role of the communist party in power. Well, whether or not the constitution indicates that a party has a vanguard role or not is not essential. Does this mean that I am making some concessions to the neoliberal and bourgeois currents? I say no, because we did not have them to begin with! Nevertheless, we had a movement, followed a party, that created the revolution and directed the state for many years; it will continue to lead the state for many years to come. [applause] 37. It was history that bestowed the leadership role to our party. It earned this role through struggle; it was not given to it by the Constitution. The Constitution is not the mother of history or of the revolution. Our socialist Constitution is a daughter of history; it is a daughter of our revolution. If you love this girl, you may give her one name or another, you may give her something nice to wear; you may dress her with colors of your choice, but do not deny the fact that the Constitution is the daughter and that the revolution and history are her mothers. The socialist revolution did not create a party in our country, but a communist party created a socialist constitution in our country. [applause]. Similarly, similarly, [repeats himself] the reason that there is socialism in Cuba is not because there is a socialist constitution. 38. Cuba has a socialist constitution because there was socialism in Cuba. We were the first. It was a minor point, a technicality, but we included the word socialism in our Constitution and we will not strike it out, and that is that. [applause] I repeat, it would make no difference whether the word socialism was, or was not included in the Constitution, but since it was.... [Castro changes thought] And since the first thing the Yankees, the imperialists, and the reactionary sectors demand is that we strike the word out--they use this as a weapon, an instrument to battle socialism--we refuse to strike it out. Maybe in the future, when there is no more imperialism, our legislators may decide to draft a fancier constitution and make some sort of a change, more of a formality than anything else; however, we will not do it, and that is that. The way we see the future, we see the party leading the country indefinitely. 39. Marx, Lenin, and Engels never talked about the end of the communist party. They never did. They did say that the state would disappear someday, but not the party. As far as we can tell, the day for the state to disappear is still very far away ; in the meantime, we will continue with this system. What are we going to do? That is still to be decided more in practice than in theory. On what day and in what world will the state disappear? On that day, we will not have to get on a rocket to visit another planet, because on that day we will be on another planet. 40. Karl Marx said that humankind came out of prehistory. I believe, have always believed, and will continue to believe that the day there is no more exploitation of man by man, the day the world abides by socialist principles, by communist principles, then prehistory will have come to an end. The truth is that man has lived in prehistoric times and what man sees everyday is prehistory. Man sees the imperialist and the capitalist; man sees the monstrous crimes committed throughout the centuries. Man has witnessed the extermination of whole societies. The Yankees exterminated the U.S. Indian population; however, they claim they defend ethnic groups. The United States exterminated the Indians. They sent the Indians to live on reservations; they were taken to reservations as you would take animals to a zoo. They exterminated the Indians. The capitalists, imperialists, and colonialists exterminated whole nations, whole communities that had yet not become nations. They enslaved hundreds of millions of people. You know the crimes they have committed, you see the crimes every day. Look at what they did in Panama a few weeks ago. That is not something a civilized society, a civilized world would do. It is something you see in prehistory. 41. We still do not know when the most precious aspirations of some the founders of scientific socialism, of the great revolutionaries of our time, will come true. Therefore, these instruments are indispensable and no one knows for how long they will be indispensable. The imperialists demand the abolishment of articles this and that from the Constitution and immediately demand the dissolution of communist parties. In some places, they take away the party headquarters; in other places they seize the headquarters and demand the dissolution of the party. In some countries, the party has been dissolved, and in others, the party is being dissolved. Some parties have already given their word they will dissolve; those parties have already been divided. Behind all this is ferocious anticommunism. 42. How can you speak of socialism by unfurling the banners of anticommunism? Anticommunism is the definition of antisocialism. Don't tell me you can talk about socialism, even though this is a very handy word. In the kingdom of private property, one cannot speak of socialism under the empire of capitalism and private property. No socialist theoretician said this, and the confusion is such that socialism is discussed amid the most fierce and demanding capitalism. It has all the characteristics of capitalism. It is a disguise, a fig leaf used for covering up. How can one speak of socialism while unfurling the flags of anticommunism? Communism won the hatred of the capitalists--that was the precise reaction--because it wanted to eliminate the system of private property. Who are they trying to confuse with these stories? The anticommunist tendency is growing and it can be seen. 43. Well, we could fight to maintain the CEMA. It would be a mixed society. It would no longer exist as stated in its statutes: a union of socialist countries with socialist goals. If we maintain that joint society, change the statutes, and if it has some use, we will remain within that organization--I repeat--if it has some use. It could be useful, since strong interests have been created among the economies of these countries. 44. We know that there are many large oil pipelines that run from the USSR to socialist countries. There are large gas pipelines, large railway lines, and large electrical lines. When the peak hour has passed in one country, the peak hour begins in another. Electricity is even transferred by intercommunicated systems. I do not doubt that those countries that want to construct capitalism today have a tremendous need for those gas pipelines, oil pipelines, communications lines, electrical lines, and raw materials, which they may not be able to acquire elsewhere. There is an economic basis for maintaining ties among those who once were part of the socialist community, the so-called European socialist community. We cannot deceive ourselves. We do not have large oil or gas pipelines, power lines, or railway communications [as heard]. We export some raw material. We export some food. I do not think that they are worthless in any sense, but they do not have the same kind of power that energy has. They do not have the same kind of power that fuel, oil, gas, electricity, etcetera, have. 45. We do not know what kind of governments these countries will install. We do not know this in the year 1990. We hope that some of the existing trade agreements will still be complied during 1990. 46. We have no security, and we can have no security. So much disorder has occurred in some of these countries. There have been strikes and unrest, and production has been paralyzed. We do not even know if those products that historically and traditionally have come to us will continue to arrive. This is for the year 1990. In regard to the year 1991, on what can we base the 5-year plan for 1991 to 1995? Who will we make agreements with for this plan? What products will be guaranteed? What markets will exist for our products? What price will they pay for our sugar? Will they try to pay for sugar at the dumping prices of the world market? The immense majority of the sugar in the world is distributed in accordance with prearranged prices. The United States buys sugar from a few clients that still supply it with sugar, but it has changed to a system of national self-sufficiency. Their prices are not the same as world market prices. All the sugar that the EEC buys from countries that are associated with them in some way-- Third World countries--have a price that is sometimes 2, 3, or 4 times that of the world market. The world market price is the dumping price of sugar; it is the price of surplus sugar. 47. So what? Are we going to sell our sugar at garbage prices [Crowd shouts: ``No, no!''] and buy beads? It is also true that not all the merchandise we buy is always of the best quality. The thing is that we have become champions in using machinery and equipment; thus we have become inventors and rationalizers, because sometimes when one nut falters, we use another. Our equipment has been useful, but it is not always sophisticated; it is not always equipment of the best quality. We have bought it and we have been able to use it, not always... [Castro changes thought] In other cases, we have bought some chemical products which have been useful and valuable--we cannot deny that. We have bought just about everything, but I understand that this type of trade has been beneficial. Yet, from one year to the next, we have no security as to what trade will be like in 1990, and an important portion of the products we consume come from that area. We have no security about this in 1990, and we are completely uncertain about the period from 1991 to 1995. 48. I do not include our economic relations with the USSR. To this point, our relations with the Soviet Union have not been affected by this process. On the contrary--I should say this with all honesty--the Soviets have recently expressed, and they continue to express, their utmost willingness to maintain economic relations with us and to continue with the same or similar trade principles. They...[interrupted by applause] Of course, the USSR plays a fundamental role. 49. The problems that we have begun to encounter are the ones that stem from the same problems that the USSR is facing. They are fundamentally derived from the same problems. Problems could also arise from the situation that is occurring in countries that comprised part of the socialist community--those other countries of East Europe. 50. Of course, any difficulty that the USSR has, any serious difficulty, inevitably has repercussions on supplies to our country. Therefore, we must be aware that the stability of the Soviet Union is a matter of the utmost importance. When we hear news of destabilization in the Soviet Union, it is logical that we are profoundly concerned. When we hear news that threatens the integrity of the Soviet Union in one way or another, it is logical that we become profoundly concerned. When we hear of internal conflicts within the Soviet Union, it is natural that we become profoundly concerned. When we hear that parts of the USSR want to secede from the Soviet Union, it is natural that we become profoundly concerned. We see how important the integrity of the Soviet Union is to us and to the world, because we see all the sorts of danger that can be unleashed by nationalist movement. This would seriously put the integrity of the USSR at great risk. We all read the newspapers. We all read the news that we get from the USSR. 51. There is another phenomenon. There are currents within the USSR that opose the type of relations that exist between the USSR and Cuba. Some of the press have published several unjust articles--profoundly unjust-- which have started an opinion campaign against the type of economic relations that exist between the USSR and Cuba. I say with all frankness and with all honor that economic relations between the USSR and Cuba have been very important to us. During the years of the revolution, the USSR has maintained a generous policy toward our country. 52. However, we are not a country of beggars. We are not a country that receives gifts. We have received credit, just as all Third World countries have received credit. Even the richest countries that export oil, like Venezuela, which is the largest oil exporter in Latin America, have received credits for more than $30 billion. What country in the world, however large its income--originating from the privilege of having certain products--has not received credits? We have received credits from the USSR, as others, as all the Third World countries, even developed countries, have received credits. One of the countries that has received the most credits is the United States, to give an example. One of the most indebted countries in the world is the United States. 53. If the developed countries have received credits, what is so strange about Cuba receiving credits from a country that is its friend or ally? Was and is our friend; and it was in the sense--to explain it well--in the sense [Repeats himself] that it was a matter of friends and countries with close ties. Now, how much does it cost to produce a ton of sugar in the USSR? We export millions of tons of sugar to the USSR. How much does it cost to produce nickel and cobalt in the USSR? We export tens of thousands of tons of nickel and cobalt to the USSR and the countries of East Europe. We produce foods such as citrus fruit, not only sugar, and in recent years, we have begun to export other goods. In this same year, 1990, the value of the products from the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries and medical equipment and medical furniture that we will export to the USSR will exceed 200 million rubles. These important categories of our country's exports to the USSR are being created. 54. No one gives us things. We buy them and we pay for them. If our sugar receives a higher price than the world dumping price, it is still a fair price, because it put an end to the phenomenon of unequal terms of trade. In the initial years of the revolution, the USSR paid us more or less the world market price, until the USSR itself realized that while the prices of industrialized products that are exported were constantly rising, the prices of products of the Third World were dropping, and this became robbery, looting. We have proposed the kind of fair economic relations which were established between the USSR and Cuba. 55. Now there are people in the USSR--not in the government, not in the party, but in the mass media and the parliament--who advocate abolishing the economic relations that exist between the USSR and Cuba. So, we see two dangers: the dangers that derive from the problems in the USSR itself that prevent it from meeting its commitments even if it wants to; and even if they do, what they have been doing to meet as well as possible their commitments to us. The current internal problems, unquestionably associated with reactionaries and imperialism, openly advocate the end of these relations. 56. This is why I said we live in times of uncertainty. We also are seeing manifestations of great demagogy in some sectors which are gaining strength in the USSR. The evolution of these events in a negative direction would naturally have very great and negative repercussions on the supplies our country receives, as well as on our country's economy. The Yankees know this, even more so at this time of elation and triumphalist euphoria. They are counting on the problems we are going to have--and it is certain we will have them because of what has happened--and the much greater problems we could have because of what could happen. They hope that the USSR will not be able to overcome its problems, or that the problems will be such that they will directly affect economic relations between the USSR and Cuba. 57. They say it openly; they do not hide it. They build it into their plans, independent of their old aggressive plans, independent of their boldness, their arrogance, their euphoria, which has led them to commit monstrosities such as the invasion of Panama--a monstrosity that was a crime against international law, but also a political monstrosity that showed complete scorn for international public opinion and the Latin American countries. These are things we should know about and keep very much in mind, with a great sense of reality. The reactionaries and imperialists of the world believe many more things. They think we will not be able to overcome the difficulties we face. That is what they hope. 58. They confuse this indigenous revolution, born in the hearts of our people, with other revolutions or political processes that were extraordinarily influenced by special circumstances in international life or in the international situation. They confuse a lot of things. Perhaps they also think one would have to travel to another planet to see a people capable of enduring under all these problems. They say euphorically that we are going to be left isolated, that we are going to be left alone, that we are going to have great problems, and they are sure that we will not be able to endure. 59. Not only our enemies say this; there are many friends in the world who are worried, and sincerely worried, by this situation, by the problems that may arise for Cuba from this situation. They wonder how we will be able to endure. Those who want, who sincerely hope that we will be able to endure, wonder. Well, some even express their condolences, some mourn for us while we are still alive, some think that the revolution could collapse here as other political processes have collapsed in recent months. Our enemies, of course, dream day and night, but every day that passes they see that the Cuban revolution continues to exists. It is like a great nightmare when they wake up in the morning--a waking nightmare. 60. But there are others who are sincerely worried by these problems. They are concerned about Cuba's situation. But it is not a simple problem of solidarity. There are a lot of people, many who have not even traditionally been friends, many who have nothing to do with socialism or communism. Many people talk about progressive democrats, some that are not even so democratic or so progressive. But of course, among all the democratic and progressive people in the world, there is concern about Cuba, and many other people are concerned because of other factors, other reasons. 61. There are a lot of people concerned about the turn of events in the Third World. On 7 December we said that if the development of certain very negative trends continued, the world would be moving away from a period...[rephrases] would be moving away from bipolarity toward unipolarity; that is, domination; that is, toward unipolarity under the domination of the United States. This is what I stated on 7 December. I know that this is a very deep concern of the leaders of Third World countries. They are extremely concerned about it. A world where the United States is the master is one of the problems. We mentioned some brazen interventionist actions. There has even been the case of the Philippines, where, independent of the internal problem, the U.S. sent its planes to intervene in an internal problem of the Philippines; operations in El Salvador, where special units disembarked during the offensive of the Salvadoran patriots; and the threats against Panama. 62. Only a few weeks, a month, 6 weeks, after I said those words; only 2 weeks after I said those words; the terrible aggression against Panama was launched; the genocidal attack against the Panamanian people was launched. This further confirmed what we had been talking about. A few days later, and with the excuse that they were fighting drug trafficking, the United States deployed carriers and battleships to block the Colombian coast. 63. Latin America is very worried, very worried. They are sincerely concerned about what could happen to Cuba. The truth is that Cuba is a trench in Latin America's independence. Cuba is the first trench in Latin America's independence. [applause] Cuba has been capable of resisting for more than 30 years; Cuba has experienced many situations over these past 30 years. Cuba helped Latin America in many ways. In the beginning it was profitable to join the blockade because, thanks to the blockade, several countries were able to distribute Cuba's sugar quota among themselves. This represented several billion tons of sugar. Those countries later lost these quotas but they had it good for quite some time. They profited from the aggression against Cuba. 64. Thanks to Cuba the United States remembered that Latin America existed and a U.S. President organized the Alliance for Progress. This organization distributed thousands of millions of dollars in donations and loans in Latin America. Thanks to Cuba the imperialists began to give more thought to the way they were treating Latin America. They opened doors for loans and treated the area better because they feared the outburst of more revolutions throughout Latin America. In other words, Latin American profited from our revolution. Most of all, Latin America got more respect. Speaking before some organization we once said that because of the Cuban revolution, the peoples of Latin American became freer and more independent, and began to see more international participation. Latin America acted more freely and with more dignity. This became evident in recent years in Geneva during the debates on human rights; this became evident recently when Cuba was proposed as a temporary member--for 2 years--of the UN Security Council. We have also been able to see more unity and independence in Latin America. 65. The Latin American governments know that if the United States were to succeed and crush the Cuban revolution, the independence of the Latin American countries would suffer a terrible blow. Those countries do not have the unity we have nor do they have the defense capacity we have. We have a people united and prepared for defense. Latin America and the Latin American politician do not necessarily have to be prosocialist or progressive to understand that the elimination of the Cuban revolution would turn the United States into an uncontrollable power in this hemisphere. 66. They know that the imperialist domination would increase, that there would be an unmeasurable degree of euphoria and arrogance. They know this. They know that our country is that first trench. This has been known since the time of Marti, not just now. It has been known for nearly a century, since that time when the United States was much less powerful, when it was not the empire it is today. 67. On the eve of his death, Marti wrote that everything he had done and will do was designed to prevent-- through Cuban independence-- the United States from expanding throughout Latin America as another power. Marti saw this almost a century ago. What a visionary man. More than ever before, this is today an indisputable reality, because Cuba not only continued to be in opposition to the Yankees but it has also become a bulwark against Yankee domination and expansion. 68. That which was true almost a century ago is today 10 times, 20 times, 30 times more true. The peoples of Latin America and their governments are aware of this. For a long time they lured and deceived the Latin American peoples by instilling fear of communism in them, and now they themselves are saying that communism is disappearing, that communism will disappear from the face of the earth. They can no longer use this ghost. There is another reality: If imperalism managed to liquidate, to crush the Cuban revolution, it would treat presidents of the other nations as mayors --perhaps even worse than mayors--as mayors having less independence than that enjoyed by mayors in the United States. It would treat the sovereign Latin American nations as mayoralties and it would try to give them orders by telephone. This does not mean that the peoples will resignedly accept this fate because no people will ever resign themselves to endure such a fate. 69. Yet, you can see that the invasion of Panama did not elicit the resistance it should have elicited. There were adverse reactions but no energetic, decisive condemnations because of the tremendous level of economic dependence the Latin American nations today have on the United States. 70. But, if Cuba fell, this would put an end to the high degree of political independence, to the degree of freedom achieved by those countries in the international sector. These countries would thus become an easy target for any act of aggression by the United States. Hence, they are concerned about these problems and about these situations. 71. I believe these are subjects that merit reflection. For years our people have prepared for certain threats. For 10 years we have been reinforcing our defenses, we have applied the concept of the war by all the people, and we have been preparing for 10 years. What a great effort! We have drawn up plans for every contingency, including a possible total blockade of the country, in which case not even a bullet will reach our country. We have known this for a long time, before these problems erupted, because of the superiority in conventional weapons the empire has in this part of the world and of its air and naval superiority, which would make it impossible for us to receive a single bullet. They could decide to impose a total blockade and we have drawn up our plans to resist a total blockade. It could be just a blockade, or it could be a blockade with harassment. Or it could be a blockade with a war of attrition against our country. Or it could ultimately be a blockade with an invasion of our country. In the face of all these possibilities, we have devised the respective contingency plans and we have prepared ourselves in the country with the conviction that any form of aggression, no matter how costly it might be, will sooner or later be defeated. Even--the worst scenario of all--the invasion of the country. [applause] The worst of all would be the invasion of the country. 72. We have divided the country into defense zones. Men, women, children, youths, senior citizens; the people at large have organized to make the aggressors pay an unpayable price: to inflict on them such heavy damage and casualties that they would have no alternative other than to leave the country. We have worked seriously on all those contingency plans. What great vision by our party! How well we have used our energy all these years by working according to a concept based on the people's participation in that struggle! There may be other forms of aggression for which we must prepare. We call the total blockade period a special period in time of war. Yet, in the face of all these problems we must prepare and even devise plans for a special period in time of peace. What does a special period in time of peace mean? That we would have such serious economic problems in our relations with socialist countries that, owing to certain factors or to the process within the Soviet Union, our country may have to endure an extremely difficult supply situation. 73. Remember that all our fuel comes from the USSR. What we could do, for example, is reduce this by one-third or one-half because of the difficulties in the USSR. We might even reduce it to zero, which is comparable to what we do in the situation we call the special period during wartime. It would not be so serious because possibilities would exist for exports and imports even under these conditions, assuming there was peace. This would be the worst situation the country might face during a special period in peacetime. We are working intensely under this premise. 74. In reality, we did not expect all these catastrophic problems, the things that occurred in those countries with which we had established solid economic ties, the countries which helped us defend ourselves from the imperialist blockade, and which were a basis for the country's development. Intermediate situations could arise. They may not be as serious, but they are still serious. We do not know what kind of difficulties we may still face in 1990. We are trying to foresee this, but there are things we cannot control and they slip through our fingers. No one knows what kind of difficulties we will face in 1991. Nevertheless, the country must be more serious and firm in confronting these difficulties, but I am not just talking about simply confronting these difficulties to survive. We want to confront these difficulties and, in addition, develop. We know which strategic points we must continue to work on. 75. The food programs cannot be discontinued. They are strategic. What we are doing in water-resource management, water sources, and canal and irrigation systems, should not be stopped under any circumstances. If we have 5 million tons or 3 million tons, we must continue with that program in one way or another. We would discontinue some other program before we discontinue these programs. We cannot discontinue the programs for the development of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, which have great possibilities in this country. We cannot and should not discontinue these programs. The programs for the development of certain resources with external currency, such as the programs we are planning in tourism, should not be discontinued. No matter how large the restriction the country must make in a certain situation during a special period in peacetime, or during a very difficult situation in peacetime because of these problems, we should not discontinue programs strategic to development under any of these circumstances. It would take us more time and it would be a very difficult test, but we would have to maintain the principles of surviving and developing. I think that our people are capable of doing this. I am absolutely convinced that this people--you, this congress, the people you represent--are capable of doing this. [applause] 76. Imperialism and world reactionary sectors should know that the revolution cannot be defeated. Our friends throughout the world should know that our people will be able to resist under any circumstances. They should know.... [interrupted by applause] They should know that in Cuba, the revolution will not crumble! Socialism will not crumble in Cuba! [crowd applauds and chants: ``Long live socialism! Fatherland or death, we will win! Long live Fidel! Socialism or death!''] 77. I can remember that during the war of our liberation, Batista's army surrounded the Sierra Maestra and shelled it. The soldiers would not allow anything to get through--not salt, lard, clothes, or medicine. However, tens of thousands of peasants remained in the Sierra Maestra, they never left the Sierra Maestra. Those were difficult days; no one knew how long it would last. Very difficult times, however, that was nothing new to us. Some had it worse than others, but we were all one people and one blood. I am sure that had this situation occurred in another area, the people would have reacted in the same manner. 78. Today we have a different kind of responsibility. I briefly explained this to our youths last night in Central Park. We are living in times of uncertainty and threats. We are experiencing serious military threats and, as you can see, the United States is bent on continuing its hostilities. They want to force a television station on us and to do this are using a frequency that is ours and that no one has a right to use but us. These are provocations. 79. The other day a shot was fired and it was a miracle that a guard at Guantanamo Base was not killed. Their battleships and carriers sail around us. They are arrogant, they are mad. They have gotten brave and euphoric. They are under the impression that socialism no longer exists and this makes them more aggressive and more dangerous. A new era, a new phase is beginning. Times of trial may be starting for our people. 80. I was thinking about this yesterday when I was addressing the youths. I recalled our history. I recalled our 10-year war. No greater feat has ever been recorded; 10 years during which our people not only fought against the Spaniards but also fought men who had been born in this country and who were fighting on the side of the Spaniards. They fought barefoot and practically naked for 10 years. They had practically no ammunition or food. Our country has even lived through situations that amaze us. Even under those terrible conditions when our people reached the conclusion that they could no longer continue fighting, even at that moment, and as an expression of our people's irreducible will and heroism, Antonio Maceo rose and, in light of El Zanjon Pact, proclaimed his decision to continue fighting there in Mangos de Baragua. [applause] During those very difficult days we had our El Zanjon, but we also had our Baragua. It was not El Zanjon that went down in our history, it was Baragua; and because of what happened at Baragua, we became an independent nation despite the Spanish Army and later, the U.S. Army. 81. That was the supreme lesson of which we are privileged heirs. That is how the soul of this people was formed and how the people established their tradition during difficult, very difficult times. We must remember that. We also toured the streets of the city with torches then, in tribute to Marti. There was not a single rifle or bullet, but that did not stop the fight. Afterward, we had a few rifles and a handful of men, and this did not stop the fight. That was the will of Baragua. That was the spirit of never yielding and of never weakening in the struggle. This made our successes possible. This made the revolution possible. It made socialism possible. It made Giron possible. This made possible the integrity with which our people confronted the October crisis. It was and is based on that policy. It didn't matter that there were nuclear weapons involved. [applause] It must be said that we did not give a single inch. If those missiles had been ours, they would still be here. There is absolutely no doubt about it. [applause] 82. We did what was possible to resist the blockade. We developed international relations and fulfilled internationalist missions. We were able to make victory possible in the internationalist mission in Angola. The perseverance, the firmness, the will to fight, the spirit of Baragua is what triumphed there. That has been the spirit expressed at all times. That is the great inheritance of our people and I think this generation is privileged. Our youths, students, working students, the people, everyone [claps his hands once] is privileged because I think it is a privilege for everyone, even those who are 100 years old, to be living this historic moment. [applause] It is a privilege. 83. The fact that many peoples have their eyes on Cuba is a singular destiny for the reasons I have already explained. There are many revolutionaries and there are more revolutionaries each day, so confusion is dissipated. Everything is seen more clearly and one can see what Cuba is. Cuba has become a trench for Latin America, as well as for the entire third world. It has become a trench for the world's revolutionary, progressive, and just ideas. Here we are not ashamed to speak of Lenin and to praise Lenin while others are taking Lenin's name off streets and parks and tearing down statues of Lenin, Marx, and Engles. We build those things here. We construct them. [applause] We do not construct these things of marble, bronze, or steel. We build them with our revolutionary conduct, our heroism, our worthy stance, our profound convictions. We elevate more than ever the banners of Marxism-Leninism, of socialism, and of communism. [applause] 84. Today more than ever, we raise the name of Marti, Maceo, Cespedes, Agramonte, and the unending legion of heroes of our war of independence. It fills our hearts with joy to see the figures of our patriots, especially that of Marti. We can see it in the work of the youth in the newspaper, the slogan: ``My sling is the sling of David'' [name of the torchlight parade held on 27 January]. That enthusiastic search in the infinite well of revolutionary ideas from Jose Marti enriched us and the wealth of the men born here should be ours. That which was given by these extraordinary men born here should be ours. We have made ours the ideas of extraordinary men born in other parts of the world. What an enormous source of revolutionary ideas. How contemporary, how opportune those ideas are. What banners they are and what a lesson they are for everyone, even those who thought that this stage had passed. 85. Some fools have filled their mouths with garbage and say that the heroic phase has passed. Like Palmero would say: They are souls in their underwear. [laughter] They say that the heroic phase of the revolution has passed. There is no lack of fools like this or of dreamers who think that the revolution can be destroyed. There is no lack of fools, of traitors [zajoneros]. Things get a little rough and they begin to think: Well, we must be careful. We must be careful because of things, reforms, reforms [repeats himself]. The revolution is the largest and most extraordinary reform in history because it changes everything. [applause] Do we want capitalist reforms? [Crowd answers: ``No!''] Do we want bourgeois reforms? [Crowd answers: ``No!''] Do we want neoliberal reforms? [Crowd answers: ``No!''] We don't even want that in our dreams. [Crowd answers: ``Never!''] 86. Everyone should know that the revolution will not step back an inch. As I was telling you yesterday, there are some people who wanted to save socialism by making concessions. How little do they know about the voracious, monstrous mentality of imperialism and of reactionary forces. If you give them a little nail, they will want a phalanx of your little finger; if you give them a phalanx, they will want a finger; if you give them the finger, they will ask for a hand; if you give them the hand, they will ask for the forearm; if you give them the forearm, they will ask for the arm; and when you give them the arm; they will cut your head off. [applause] 87. How does one defend socialism by becoming armless and lame? To lose one's arms is to lose strength. One would also be left without something else, without a heart for instance [laughter, applause] without a spirit. What ways of defending socialism and revolutionary ideas are these? Hence, our revolution will not step back an inch. 88. We convey our gratitude to those who are truly concerned and who have advised us to make changes. We have answered, yes, we will carry out revolutionary actions. We are going to make revolutionary changes. We are going to be more and more revolutionary because we are still not revolutionary enough. [applause] 89. There are always fools or idiots--although there are just a few harboring illusions and believing that here it is possible to organize fifth columns at the service of imperialism, at the service of the objectives of imperialism. You keep a close watch on those people. You check on them because many of them might even raise the banners of imperialism and reactionary forces tomorrow. Like the United States, they want to perfect this revolution, just as they wanted to do it over there, by unleashing a gigantic and revolutionary wave which began disguised as changes and reforms; this is known here, but they will have to go to another planet. I am not saying this in the liberal sense that they will be dead, because we do not know if heaven, the earth, or hell is on some planet or beyond the planets. We do not know this. But we do know it will not be here in this country that there will be those believing they can organize a fifth column; those believing they can repeat the story that happened in other countries. Those seeking to play the counterrevolution here will have to confront the masses, they will have to confront the people, they will have the masses here facing them. [applause] 90. This also applies to those seeking to play the imperialist game at this decisive time of history, at this time when everything is at stake. It is a well-established, realistic idea in Cuba that revolution, socialism, and national independence are essentially linked. No one should dream about imperialism achieving its dream of crushing the Cuban revolution. We would thus be less independent than Puerto Rico, less independent than Panama today. It would never again release this country. Never again. We would disappear as a nation. Therefore, we cannot play with this here. We will not allow that game here. Nor will we allow anyone to play it. [applause] 91. We will not be the ones who will crush them. We cannot kill cockroaches with cannon shells. The people will crush them. [applause] The people will crush them. [applause] 92. Our defense committees, the workers in our factories, the students in our centers, the workers, will crush them. [applause] Let them not indulge in wishful thinking; this is a people ready to sell their lives high, a people ready to shed even their last drop of blood for the values they believe in. You cannot play with this people. With a people who bear on their shoulders the responsibility Cuba has, of being the first trench for the interests of Latin America and the third world, and the revolutionary and moral values of this world. We never sought such things. It was destiny that has placed on our shoulders a very great responsibility at this time, as a brake, as a trench; against reactionaries, against imperialism, against the exploiters, against those who have looted the world for centuries and intend to continue to loot it. 93. When a people has the responsibility on its shoulders, and that people is this one, you cannot play with this people. [applause] We will leave here to fulfill our tasks--we know them more and better--to strive more than ever, to do our best more than ever in defense, at work, in fulfilling our duties and our obligations, in working for the future as we have always worked, and always ready to defend that future we want to win, always ready to defend what we have won already, always ready to defend our ideals and defend our dignity and our independence and our freedom, our nation. We will dedicate ourselves to defense, work; to face problems and solve them--those we have now and those to come, tomorrow or the day after or whenever. 94. And if they do not come, we will also work with the same dedication. If there is peace, we will know how to enjoy peace. We will know how to take better advantage of each day, each hour, each minute, each second. This is the spirit with which we should leave this historic congress, at this decisive time, perhaps the eve of great trials. If these trials come, a day like today in which we observe one more anniversary of his birth, we can say to Marti, we should say that today, more than ever, we need his thinking; more than ever, we need his ideas; today, more than ever, we need his virtues; but also to Marti, to Maceo, and to all those who were like them, we can say, today, more than ever, that we feel proud to be their followers, to be their disciples; and to reaffirm today, 28 January, our two immortal watchwords; which join Marx, Lenin, and Engels with Marti and Maceo and Cespedes and all the glorious heroes of our independence: Socialism or death, fatherland or death, we will win! [applause; chanting of ``Fidel''] -END-